|
C3V and SoV Customs A place for C3V and SoV customs |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
Quote:
Check out my ebay where you can find my custom dice trays and dicetowers: https://www.ebay.com/usr/captainamazing_jerdo |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
The C3V doesn't take requests to change its cards after release.
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
WILD is in the name of the power, It feels clear to me.
Have you tried Hexscape? 3D Heroscape Multiplayer Battle program! Looking for a C3V/SOV miniature? Try one of these sites. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
Like Leaf_It suggests, probably worth adding an R&C to the first post so it's clear when someone checks the book for it.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
It is what it is then. After discussion, I see the intent of the card. But the text is very open to interpretation. It does seem funny that the card wont under any circumstances be changed even under a small clarification of text to better portray what the card is after. Even though it does not affect the game play or structure of the card. You guys realize that even legitimate companies have errata updates, even though this one would just clarify the card better.
Check out my ebay where you can find my custom dice trays and dicetowers: https://www.ebay.com/usr/captainamazing_jerdo |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
I think superfrog is overstating it. I don't see why we wouldn't take requests to change cards. It's just that it's very unlikely to be granted. In this case, I can't imagine we'd change the intent and I think an R&C is sufficient for the wording.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
OP updated with a clarification. For some reason I missed that this was all in discussion of some confusion at the tournament. Sorry for being a bit abrasive.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
I agree that this one was poorly worded. I feel it isnt clear on the card. I experienced confusion around it as well and had to seek out an answer. Whether C3V implements errata changes is their call. I see the arguments both ways, but this was a rare misstep in editing.
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
Exactly. When in need of clarity, sometimes the name of a power is evidence for how it works. Double Attack's wording implies infinite attacks, but the name (plus common sense) obviously indicates what the original designers intended.
Speaking of common sense, I think the wording of Wild Strategic Bonding is pretty clear from a colloquial English perspective. For example, if I saw a hit and run incident on a street and the fleeing car was red, but I was unsure if it was a Honda or Toyota, I would describe it to the cops as "a red Honda or Toyota." The vast majority of fluent English listeners would understand that to mean that I saw a red car that was either a Honda or Toyota, not that I saw a red Honda or a Toyota of unknown color. |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
Quote:
The worst part of the wording in relation to this card is that each side of the "or" clause doesn't necessarily need to be related like it does in your car example. If you said you saw a red Honda or Toyota truck, we know that both sides of the "or" clause are intrinsically related. If you asked us to guess what the first car you owned was and tell us it was either a red Honda or Toyota truck. I think now it leaves room for interpretation. Red Honda? Toyota truck? Despite my own confusion on it, I may have actually ended up interpretting this card correctly on my own (don't remember), but I'm speaking up because I do think the wording on this card left things open for interpretation, something a card shouldn't do (where possible). It should be explicit and ideally shouldn't require an R&C. It just seems like cutting out a couple extra words was of little benefit compared to improved clarity a couple more words would have provided. |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
Quote:
Check out my ebay where you can find my custom dice trays and dicetowers: https://www.ebay.com/usr/captainamazing_jerdo |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Dreadgul Raiders
It should be more clear, but I am OK with card as if - I just deal with it, as long as there is the FAQ in the OP, which there is.
On a related note, Pel the Hill Giant is a new C3V figure that bonds with them (Book arriving hopefully soon). Also, for those wishing they can use more giants with them, I made a Competitive Unit Alter for Frost Giant of Morh that changes it to Wild (among other things) so it bonds with the Dreadgul Raiders. C3V/SoV cards @ 3/page PDF / LeftOn4ya's Customs (including Jurassic World) / Competitive Unit Alters / New? Start Here! Unit Debates REVIVED - #76 Tandros Kreel vs Torin "Today is a good day to die... but the day is not yet over"
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with collection D1 Glaun Bog raiders | technomage | Official Rules & FAQ's | 4 | May 24th, 2010 08:38 PM |
Strategic Maneuvers: Orc Raiders | Tai-Pan | Heroscape Strategy Articles | 3 | May 22nd, 2010 09:04 AM |
Raiders of Zombie Island | kolakoski | Maps & Scenarios | 7 | December 22nd, 2009 11:49 PM |