|
C3V and SoV Customs A place for C3V and SoV customs |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
That's the thing with making new units. It's going to shift thing down just by adding things (and even if you improve older units, like say Dund, that's going to shift other units down). It's a necessary evil, and while you can minimize it, there's no eliminating it.
"They are too numerous to fight. What shall we do?" "Fight anyway." "You can never defeat another if you know not how to defeat yourself." my tradelist |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
Just waiting on a few Books and I'll get these in the OP. The spreadsheet is ready to go.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
Raelin the Kyrie Warrior [RotV]: A+ -> B-
Major Q9: A+ -> B- Deathreavers: A+ -> B- Zettian Deathwings: B- -> A+ 10 Years of Gencon/Scapecon Battle Reports - Comic Battle Reports - Probability Calculator App - Reverse the Whip Army Archetypes "It's all about the game." - Sgt. Ernie Calhoun |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
His Queglix's sweaty, Reav's weak, Kyrie's heavy There's three heads on the terrain already, bombs from Zetti's He's nervous, but on the surface he looks calm and ready To drop bombs, but he keeps on forgettin' (to click the right button) But to keep things focused on unit discussion, I was inspired to use the deathwings from the following video. Might be better than you think. Last edited by brak88; May 1st, 2020 at 08:05 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
If we've learned anything, clearly it's that.
Hi, vegie! Sorry we won't see you & your dad this year. Please tell him I said hi. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
Oh I definitely do think that the Zettians are better than B-. They are a two-man squad, but they have a lot of other things going for them.
-Ranged flying -Special attack -5 defense vs. range Your Arktos synergy with them was very clever. Adjacency attack boosting range is lethal and I don't think that combination is heavily explored yet with Arktos. Arktos is even better than Marcus for this type of use since Arktos himself has a solid ranged attack. I think I'd go B+ for Zettians. Don't think a B- squad could take down Q9 Raelin Rats even assuming they rolled super well so they have to be higher than B-. To be honest I'm also thinking Q9 has to go down a peg in the ratings to A. VC has pushed out so many Q9 counters over the years: Cultists, Heracles, Marutuk all are better counters to Q9 than anything in original Heroscape. He just doesn't have the potential to sit on a hill unscratchable like he used to. Incendiborgs maybe go up a peg too to share the A rating with Q9? At this point I'm not sure which one I'd rather take to a Bring Cheese event. I was really impressed by them in both of Tiamat's games in the OHS Bring the Cheese. They are somewhere between Major Q9 and a super version of 1x Mezzos. Major Q23 has jokingly said that Mezzos are A+ but only when playing 1 squad but I think there's some truth in the idea. Redundant Systems and Exoskeletons are substantially better with lower numbers of figures because keeping each figure alive is more significant. And Redundant Systems working against specials and lava and disengage where exo doesn't is huge. A lot of the ways that you can counter range support like Krav or Q9 is running at them and smashing them in, but that's substantially worse against Vulcanmechs since they can weather the storm. Trying not to overreact as there haven't been that many games played, but I think in general these rankings were done off a lot of theoryscape rather than games. I have more thoughts but I'll finish after the tournament (unless I get excited and want to say more sooner). 10 Years of Gencon/Scapecon Battle Reports - Comic Battle Reports - Probability Calculator App - Reverse the Whip Army Archetypes "It's all about the game." - Sgt. Ernie Calhoun |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
Incendiborgs are already A.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
Ah okay. That makes sense. Didn't see that. I'm not sure why Major Q10 is in A up there with the big boys but that's another conversation.
10 Years of Gencon/Scapecon Battle Reports - Comic Battle Reports - Probability Calculator App - Reverse the Whip Army Archetypes "It's all about the game." - Sgt. Ernie Calhoun |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
Quote:
Have you tried Hexscape? 3D Heroscape Multiplayer Battle program! Looking for a C3V/SOV miniature? Try one of these sites. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
I think it's essentially the same conversation as Q9 being an "A", right? absent your arguments for downgrading Q9 from A+, I don't see how you would downgrade Q10 from A. Q10 is really really good, it's just that Q9 outshines Q10 for 30 points more. There are times where Q10's SAs are better than Q9's SA, but it's not all the time and it doesn't make up for 2 more defense.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3V/SoV-inclusive Power Rankings
I mean in the same sense that Wolves of Badru's SA is sometimes better than Quiglex? Q10 is clearly outclassed by the other A figures. I'm way more scared of Kaemon than Q10. No one took Q10 in either of the two bring the cheese tournaments in the past month. I think he's A- or even B+. 5 defense just isn't that good for 150 points. But anyway. Different conversation.
10 Years of Gencon/Scapecon Battle Reports - Comic Battle Reports - Probability Calculator App - Reverse the Whip Army Archetypes "It's all about the game." - Sgt. Ernie Calhoun |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Classic Heroscape Power Rankings | spider_poison | Competitive Armies Discussion | 4661 | December 8th, 2018 12:30 AM |
Power Rankings for Other Formats | Elginb | Competitive Armies Discussion | 2 | August 15th, 2011 06:09 PM |
Power Rankings - Another Scaper's Opinion | killercactus | Competitive Armies Discussion | 202 | February 22nd, 2010 02:17 PM |
Revising the Power Rankings | Messenger | Competitive Armies Discussion | 33 | May 16th, 2009 11:07 PM |