Daredevil (Matt Murdock) (Yellow)

[Ronin]

Daredevil (Yellow)



Card PDF

NAME = DAREDEVIL
IDENTITY = MATT MURDOCK

UNIQUENESS = UNIQUE HERO
SPECIES = MUTATE
CLASS = FIGHTER
PERSONALITY = FEARLESS

SIZE/HEIGHT = MEDIUM 5

LIFE = 4

MOVE = 6
RANGE = 4
ATTACK = 4
DEFENSE = 4

POINTS = 160

STEALTH LEAP 12 SPECIAL MOVE
Move 3. Height 12.
Daredevil gains Flying and Stealth.

BATTLIN' BACK 17
After Daredevil's normal attack action, roll a d20 and add 2 for each figure he is engaged with. On a 17+, Daredevil gains another normal attack action.

RADAR DEFENSE 17
Before Daredevil defends, roll a d20 and add 2 for each space the attacking figure moved this turn. On a 17+, Daredevil avoids the attack.

FACTION =
PUBLISHER = MARVEL
KEYWORDS = Blind
SYMBOLS = SONIC WEAKNESS

SPRING 2024 - ANNIVERSARY: After his father - Battlin' Jack Murdock - was killed by mobsters, Matt Murdock was driven to fight for justice. The fledgling defense attorney took a direct approach to fighting crime as Daredevil, fashioning his first costume from his dad's old boxing robes.

Resources and Rulings

• The suggested figure for this unit is a Heroclix figure: Avengers/Defenders War #020 / Daredevil
• See this card's wiki page for synergies and strategies!

Credits

• Legacy design: Ronin
• Card art: japes
• Comic creators: Stan Lee and Bill Everett

Updates

• N/A

[Ronin]

Was looking for a quick win in the old LD backlog and honestly I tend to want to tweak most stuff.

Couldn't remember if we'd done anything like Battlin' Back yet, figured I'd wing it and let someone correct me.

[Karat]

Seems cool. I might move the "normal attack action" part to that first sentence and then cut everything behind the "can attack again" language. It feels pretty clear that way that it is still part of that normal attack action. Should we cap the number of times he can attack? Not that I think it necessarily needs one, we just normally do cap those.

[japes]

YELL-O....awesome to see. And fitting with Owl being converted.

[IAmBatman]

Raphael does a similar thing to Battlin' Back.

We ended up going with separate attack actions there due in part to the timing of Combat Flip and wanting him to be able to use it between attacks, but also because the "after attacking" trigger doesn't quite work for this kind of thing (needs to be either after combat when attacking or after the attack action, since just after the attack itself is immediately after the attack is rolled, before it's defended or wounds are placed and after all those things is after combat).

Radar Defense probably wants something like "who has 1+ skulls" to use the 1+ construction and to avoid specifying rolled or not for the skulls. Could also just say "attacker" over "attacking figure" there.

For d20 boosts, I've been going with saying things like "add 2" instead of "add 2 to your roll" for the most part, since context should make it pretty clear what you're adding to.

[Soundwarp SG-1]

I'm still very meh on being Blind somehow equaling "not being damaged by light" but at this point I just dont care anymore

[Soundwarp SG-1]

IDK how we're really doing release stuff these days, but would be cool if we could use this as a springboard to the Fabulous Firsts thing in 2.0 !

[MrNobody]

Originally Posted by Soundwarp SG-1

IDK how we're really doing release stuff these days, but would be cool if we could use this as a springboard to the Fabulous Firsts thing in 2.0 !

Are there any conversions that would fit that?

[Soundwarp SG-1]

Originally Posted by MrNobody

Are there any conversions that would fit that?

I dont think so sadly? Maybe Mark I (and even 2) Iron Man?

Like I mean techically there are cards that would work as someone's first appearance, but not really any that fit the weird first appearance dealio.

Might be one out there we could "reskin" I guess.

Not saying we have to delay this to build a release around to be clear. Just would be cool if it works out.

[Yodaking]

If the light based attack is specifically attacking the eyes, then yea a Blind persons wouldn't care about that, but other uses of light damage (like the daggers made from light Dagger makes, or Light based attack from an angel) shouldn't be limited by the ability to see it. As such I would think those specific abilities that attack the eyes/sight would just call out Blind folks as not being effected by it and leave the light resistance off here.

[japes]

Originally Posted by Yodaking

If the light based attack is specifically attacking the eyes, then yea a Blind persons wouldn't care about that, but other uses of light damage (like the daggers made from light Dagger makes, or Light based attack from an angel) shouldn't be limited by the ability to see it. As such I would think those specific abilities that attack the eyes/sight would just call out Blind folks as not being effected by it and leave the light resistance off here.

that makes sense to me.

[Soundwarp SG-1]

Originally Posted by japes

that makes sense to me.

Oh sure but when I say the samething I'm a wrongo wrongerston. Really feeling the love