|
C3V and SoV Customs A place for C3V and SoV customs |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#2497
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
Quote:
|
#2498
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Tyrian could be good most likely with deathreavers, raelin, and 190 points of whatever. Deathreavers go and tie up those coming towards him. Tyrian, on height and with raelin can snipe twice at figures. The rest of the figures take care of the what's left.
Last edited by Heroscaper Guy; October 4th, 2012 at 03:36 PM. Reason: math was wrong |
#2499
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
We tested her at 150, and she was broken...she beat 4th Mass, Knights and Q9 armies at least 80% of the time with Sacred band!! We had to raise her points or she'd be better that any other unit...period...I did a lot of those early tests. It ended up being, we had to raise her enough so you were limited on how many squads you can play with her in a 500ish point game. C3V Current Broadcast 4/29/2015 C3V Testimonial from " Easily the best quality classic customs I have ever seen" MY MINIATURE COLLECTION -- NEW VALHALLA |
#2500
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
Arashara 4x Sacred Band vs a Cyprien + skellies army. Arashara's team won with quite a few Greeks (and Arashara with a few wounds) remaining. When I first saw her card I thought there was a typo. Once I played her I realized how formidable she really is, and worth 200 points. At 150 I'd be terrified to see her on my opponent's team. Greeks and Romans are 50 points each... that's incredibly cheap for a 4-man bonding ranged squad with 3 attack. |
#2501
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
For what it's worth Foudzing; I have often thought that many of the SoV units that get through are someone on the weaker side of things and the stringent requirements that submissions go through and the length of time it takes to do so are a tad frustrating. I've almost given up on submitting to SoV and resubmitting Gor'Vath may never happen even though I know there are people who would like to see him get through.
However my personal thoughts as part of SoV's counterpart C3V is that it is best to work with them instead of complaining about it extensively. If I want SoV to work better picking fights and telling them they aren't doing a good enough job is detrimental to that. |
#2502
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Caps: Tssssk don't try too fool me: Megasilver did not won General War... He was the first who played Ullar but only 6th...
Your performance with the WoA is really good, and I congratulate you for this run, but that does not make the WoA competitive (same story as our player who won with Q9+anubians wolves). Last edited by Foudzing; October 4th, 2012 at 05:48 PM. |
#2503
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
I course I didn't win General Wars with Ullar. That's near impossible. Also, I didn't win Ullar with WoA. I am THE VIPER KING. I won Ullar with Venoc Warlord, Vipers x7, Arkmer. Can't you tell by my pic and sig? C3V/SoV is NOT allowed at GenCon either. ..... On another note, WoA are competitive, especially in melee-friendly events (Heat of Battle, Slugfest, etc.). They're just not used much in tourneys outside of those events, though. |
#2504
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
The WoA are at least a solid B. I think only B+ or higher units are enough for Foundzing. C3V has released a few--the Havechs and the Incendiborgs spring to mind. There are more on the way, I think. As for the SoV, the only competitive units that have been submitted have been broken or at least underpriced--green wyrmlings, greenspawn assassins, and Gor'Vath all come to mind.
All I can say, Foundzing, is that the SoV will start passing balanced, competitive customs when people start submitting balanced, competitive customs to be judged by them. If you want that to happen, then make it happen--make some customs yourself and contribute to the customs community here to improve the quality. Nominate some customs you see with good availability that meet your standards. Last edited by caps; October 4th, 2012 at 06:07 PM. |
#2505
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
My bad, I tought Cruxg'Yrath was officially approved.
Quote:
It does not have to be Q9/Raelin/rats/Knights/10th/4th level, just B+ or higher. Again I love the ZI pretty much, but it's sad it's the strongest card from SoV. And I don't know exactly what units you're currently reviewing, I don't follow SoV that much, but I buy the figures when they're worth it (I bought only 2 squads of ZI from SoV but a lot of C3V stuff). Quote:
And btw I knew you played Vipers... I was talking about Caps's performance... ZBeeblebox: It's maybe the fact that I don't have 6 squads of Sacred Band which makes me feel she's overpriced. Personally I feel she is, and majority of french players play her at 80/100points without bonding, it's much more fun. Robbaman: When I think an unit is bad I tell it. When I think an unit is good, I tell it. I congratulated the Zombie Hulk, the ZI and Priscus. And I will congratulate for Dashi if it passes because I think it's a good unit. I think at the moment there is a real lack of B+ or more figures so I tell it, and I try to understand why, I'm not complaining for complaining. Caps: I'm not telling that only B+ or more are enough, I am telling that Heroscape needs B+ or more units, as it needs also B or lower units. And when I read the review reports I have the feelings that the judges are very strict for strong units (Gor'Vath, Green Wyrmling, Greenspawn Assassin) compare to weaker units. Yes, I agree with you caps all I need is to make a good custom which will be accepted, but for example when we finalized Kheris, we considered overpriced him (make him around 140/160points instead of 120) in order to see him go throught the SoV. At the moment I think a unit which cost more than it should be have more chance to pass through SoV than a unit which is correctly priced, and I think this is a problem. Thank you to those who take time answering me. Like you all I support the SoV, I don't want to see the SoV stop, but I think sometimes criticism is good, and even if I recognize some of my critics were not valid (Scytale pointed it out), and I sincerely apologize for this, some were and I think it's good to talk about it and not just saying "cool figure!". Last edited by Foudzing; October 4th, 2012 at 06:45 PM. |
#2506
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
Try this thread for a trip down memory lane, and feel free to add if you have something to say that hasn't already been said there. Here's an arguably even more relevant discussion, where pre-release speculation about a certain figure was that it might not be competitive. |
#2507
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
The judges here are pretty strict on all units, the highly competitive ones and the non-competitive ones. Including Cxurgy and the Sneaks, only 6 of the 26 units that received enough votes either way passed, and of those 20 units that were turned down only the couple units previously mentioned could arguably have been turned down because they were too strong. I appreciate the criticism, but the numbers just don't back you up. Honestly, this scares me. As I hope my number-crunching above demonstrates, there is no evidence to say that SoV judges are harder on highly-competitive units than non-competitive ones. The fact that no highly-competitive units have passed through SoV so far does not indicate anything about judging preferences; as I have said before the SoV does not control what gets submitted. Heck, perhaps other submitters felt the same as you, right or wrong, and weakened their submissions for a supposed better chance of making it through the process. |
#2508
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How about you play some games with the figures before judging them? It's fine to have qualms about a fiugre, but thinking your theory scape is some how more accurate then the thoughts of people who have played dozens of games with them, is a flawed way of thinking. Last edited by infectedsloth; October 4th, 2012 at 06:54 PM. Reason: I'm plan on playing x10 sneaks at my next tourny... |