|
HeroScape General Discussion General discussions of packaging, terrain, components, etc. If it doesn't fit in any other official category, put it here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
The Mind Flayer Paradox
Hello all,
I have no strategy article today so I put together something to get everyone thinking about the New Mind Flayer The Mind Flayer Paradox You have placed all your OM's on the Mind Flayer this round hoping to remove all your opponents Order makers. You look at your Opponents order markers A, B, C, and D all on the 4th Mass. Suppose You have just successfully Psionic Blasted a 4th mass figure, and get to remove a OM from a choice of Four Order makers. Of course one is the X OM; and the others are OM 1, 2, and 3. Your opponent is going to give you a boost by showing you one of the order marker that is not OM 1, but you must choose which one you will remove first. You pick an OM, say "A", hoping it is OM 1 (which would rob your opponent of their first turn), and your opponat shows you another OM, say D, which is OM 3. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick OM B or C instead?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
yes, it is.
When theres three order markers left for you to choose, there is a 33% chance it is in any one of them. Then, when you choose OM A, theres a 33% chance its OM 1, and a 66% chance that OM 1 is in one of the other two OM's. Your opponent is going to show you an order marker that is not OM1, and not the one you've chosen. When he/she gives you the oppertunity to switch, there is still a 33% chance its the one youve already chosen, and a 66% its in one of the other two, which has now been eliminated down to just one.
Spoiler Alert!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
No it is not. Though your odds of hitting OM1 are higher, your odds of hitting OMX are higher as well. On your first pick you had a 75% chance to hit a valid OM. The switch drops that to 67%. Reducing your chance of removing a viable OM in order to increase your chance of getting a "better" OM just doesn't make any sense.
~Aldin, running the numbers He either fears his fate too much or his desserts are small That dares not put it to the touch to gain or lose it all ~James Graham |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Quote:
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Aldin is 100% correct. Those of you saying he is wrong are assuming this is identical to the classic problem, in stead of thinking critically about what he wrote and actually doing out the probability.
If your goal is to get the "1", you should switch. That's the classic Monty Hall problem. If your goal is to NOT get the "X", you should not switch. And since that should be your goal, don't switch. It's a "reverse Monty Hall" problem, if you will. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Isn't that more of a 'conundrum?'
I always thought Paradox was something that somehow trapped itself in a loop of nonsense-ery. Like: The Sentence Below is True. The Sentence Above is False. Maybe I'm thinking of something else. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
This situation is a bit different from the Monty Hall problem, because there is a gradient of "wins," not just a win or lose. Getting the 1 order marker is valued higher than the 2 or 3. However, as Aldin said, gettin a 3 OM is much better than an X, so switching doesn't make sense.
On a side note, I don't know why you would put 3 OMs on a Mind Flayer, unless you have some huge initiative advantage. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Thanks dok,
Think of it as Monty Hall with three cars and a goat. One car is nicer than the others, but you really, really don't want the goat. Having a car revealed increases your chances of getting the goat if you switch. Stay with the pick you made and you are more likely to have a car - even if it's the BMW instead of the Porsche. ~Aldin, drivingly He either fears his fate too much or his desserts are small That dares not put it to the touch to gain or lose it all ~James Graham |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Mind Flayer Paradox
Ah, I get it!
I wasn't thinking that way! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hive Mind | Validon | Official Rules & FAQ's | 14 | March 29th, 2010 08:50 PM |
PARADOX - a 'Doctor Who' derivative of RftG | LordRaidor | Card Games | 0 | February 27th, 2009 12:38 AM |
Mind Games | Soul Shackle | Heroscape Strategy Articles | 20 | May 16th, 2008 06:59 PM |
Cat/Bread Paradox | lightfight | General | 46 | December 14th, 2006 08:36 PM |