The Book of Red Lantern (Bleez)

[johnny139]

Yup, that works for me, too. And it looks like no one else agrees on the "that hero" line so I figure we're good to go there, too.

[Scapemage]

Okay, changes made. @Arkham it's time for the card updates, everything should be set now. Please include a third red Battery Marker on the card.

[Arkham]

I’m not sure I understand the conclusion here. We’re including an extra marker just in case you need it to recharge someone that she steals from? Will we ever need more than one extra?

[IAmBatman]

I don't believe there's a way to get more than one extra with the current collection of figures, no.

[MrNobody]

Apologies if I’m mistaken, but shouldn’t the FAQ say the RLs can regain markers using Blood of Yismault, not Raging Plasma?

[Scapemage]

Originally Posted by Arkham

I’m not sure I understand the conclusion here. We’re including an extra marker just in case you need it to recharge someone that she steals from? Will we ever need more than one extra?

You are right on the intention. 1 marker is some breathing room for the recharge powers while also allowing space for potential future units (Rankorr mentioned by Ronin earlier) to provide more.

Originally Posted by MrNobody

Apologies if I’m mistaken, but shouldn’t the FAQ say the RLs can regain markers using Blood of Yismault, not Raging Plasma?

You are right. Updated.

[Ronin]

Yeah, you'll never need more than one extra because Bleez can only have one more than she started with.

There is actually one other wording issue here - my bad for missing it before. I worded Treacherous Rage to trigger on auto-wound powers like Raging Plasma, based on Scapey's clarification at the bottom of his post here.

One thing I meant to to do but clearly forgot, looking at the cards and SP, was to have some kind of 'out' to keep it from triggering itself. It either needs a new sentence at the end ruling that out, or the current last sentence needs to get beefed up to say the source of the wounds can't be Treacherous Rage itself.

Sorry to drop another issue here and run, but I've really got to get to work!

[Karat]

Originally Posted by Ronin

Yeah, you'll never need more than one extra because Bleez can only have one more than she started with.

There is actually one other wording issue here - my bad for missing it before. I worded Treacherous Rage to trigger on auto-wound powers like Raging Plasma, based on Scapey's clarification at the bottom of his post here.

One thing I meant to to do but clearly forgot, looking at the cards and SP, was to have some kind of 'out' to keep it from triggering itself. It either needs a new sentence at the end ruling that out, or the current last sentence needs to get beefed up to say the source of the wounds can't be Treacherous Rage itself.

Sorry to drop another issue here and run, but I've really got to get to work!

I'm not really sure what you are getting at, but I think we could drop the "...on defense..." clause as i think its already pretty clear that you are counting the blanks she already rolled for defense as unblockable hits on the attacking figure.

[Scapemage]

I added " from an attack or special power other than Treacherous Rage, " does that work?

[Ronin]

Originally Posted by Karat

I'm not really sure what you are getting at, but I think we could drop the "...on defense..." clause as i think its already pretty clear that you are counting the blanks she already rolled for defense as unblockable hits on the attacking figure.

I'm talking about Treacherous Rage, not Raging Plasma.

Originally Posted by Scapemage

I added " from an attack or special power other than Treacherous Rage, " does that work?

I'd go "with" over "from", but that should work, yeah.

[Scapemage]

SP updated. Ready for cards once more, @Arkham . Thanks for being patient.

[Karat]

Originally Posted by Ronin

I'm talking about Treacherous Rage, not Raging Plasma.

Yea, I know but I don't understand why.

I brought up Raging plasma cause including the "...on defense..." seems weird here.