The Book of Blacksmith

[Lord Pyre]

Ash doesn't have a multi-attack SA?

[IAmBatman]

EVIL DEAD
Begin the game with 6 black Deadite Markers. Any Unique Hero with a Deadite Marker on its card has the species of Demon in addition to what is listed on its card, even if Ash is destroyed. When Ash attacks a Demon, Slasher, or Undead figure with a normal or special attack, that figure rolls 1 fewer defense and he may attack one additional time.

Edit: Anyway 'd you with a proposed revision, LP.

[Arch-vile]

I like that version a lot better. Cuts out potential Waller/Cold (II) interactions entirely.

[IAmBatman]

Originally Posted by Arch-vile

I like that version a lot better. Cuts out potential Waller/Cold (II) interactions entirely.

Which is the plan for sure! I want her running a crew without either of them.

[Lord Pyre]

Originally Posted by IAmBatman

EVIL DEAD
Begin the game with 6 black Deadite Markers. Any Unique Hero with a Deadite Marker on its card has the species of Demon in addition to what is listed on its card, even if Ash is destroyed. When Ash attacks a Demon, Slasher, or Undead figure with a normal or special attack, that figure rolls 1 fewer defense and he may attack one additional time.

Edit: Anyway 'd you with a proposed revision, LP.

My point is is his Chainsaw said after attacking he could attack one additional time. And then Evil dead says he could attack with a SA one additional time. Is that 3 total attacks or 4? If we do a blanket "all Rogues have one additional attack" it could potentially restrict design space.

Either way your new version is very clean and clear.

[MrNobody]

I like that it really helps out Cold I though!

[Ronin]

Originally Posted by IAmBatman

Here's what I'm thinking to address stated concerns, including the one LV 'd me with:

I like that with this direction she helps the Rogues with weaker SAs, but not to the point of excluding Rogues without them.

Like she's just giving em a second crack at dealing a wound, so a Rogue with a beefy attack (like Girder) that's liable to get a wound in the first place is still a reasonable buddy for her.

Should help with japes' concerns about running the tightly thematic team.

[johnny139]

Was going to suggest the same thing after seeing LV's Waller concerns. I think that'll be very solid.

I don't really know what the answer is for LP's question, though. How was it played for Ash?

[IAmBatman]

Originally Posted by MrNobody

I like that it really helps out Cold I though!

Oh nooo?

[Lord Pyre]

Originally Posted by johnny139

I don't really know what the answer is for LP's question, though. How was it played for Ash?

It doesn't affect Ash, I think Bats misunderstood me. Moot anyway if we go a different direction!

[IAmBatman]

Originally Posted by Lord Pyre

It doesn't affect Ash, I think Bats misunderstood me. Moot anyway if we go a different direction!

I didn't mean that the doubling of multi-attacking SAs was done on Ash, just that Ash established precedent for doubling of special attacks, so no one could have any cows about it.

I was agreeing with you that the +1 attack was probably mechanically simpler. Not the first time I've had to jump through some mechanical end arounds to get where I wanted to go, though.

[Lord Pyre]

Don't you mean Diamondback established precedent for double Special Attacks?