Kozuke: Charging Assault? - Page 3

NecroBlade · #25 April 3rd, 2008, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Pyre

Quote:

Originally Posted by NecroBlade

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Pyre

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cavalier

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Pyre

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howl

Chris Dupuis
Hasbro Consumer Affairs

Just noticed this; could this be where they came up with Sir Dupuis' name?

Yes, indeed it is.

Sorry about being off-topic, though...

And bringing back a year-and-a-half dead thread.

But yes, they look to themselves for inspiration for names often.

This thread was on the first page...

The last post before yours was Nov. 2006. No way it was on the first page.

Lord Pyre · #26 April 3rd, 2008, 03:41 PM

Huh, that's weird. I only look at the first page of every section. That's where I saw it. I dunno...

Brewster · #27 March 22nd, 2010, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcb231

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howl

I forgot to ask if the Kozuke are then required to attack the figure they just moved adjacent to, or if they can choose not to attack.

Awesome! I'm glad this has been simply resolved. The wording on that card SUCKS. You're right though, they didn't answer if you have to attack that figure or not....I assume based on their reply that you would have to then attack.

Yes, I'm about to revive a 2-year-old thread to counter that assumption!

Since I'm on a samurai tangent I ran into this, and I can't let a clarification go unchecked at these high speeds!

You never have to attack after moving. It's perfectly legal to charge up and stand next to a figure without attacking.