|
C3G Legacy Archive of all the original discussions and workshops from the first stage of C3G. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#877
|
||||
|
||||
Thus Far
As long as we're aware of what the final intended result is, the wording can be hammered out to make it work. Cool. We're all on the same general page.
~Dysole, keeping her ducks in a row My Twitch Channel where I play Scape and other things My YouTube Channel where the games get uploaded later Dysole's Draft Rankings Map Thread (Not responsible for psychic damage) Customs Battle Reports This sentence is seven words long. This sentence is not seven words long. |
#879
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
on the Strange update. Not sure what effect it would have on the card's cost. That power only ever came into play when he was facing MD figures and I don't think that happened but 1 or 2 times he's been in play in one of my games. He hasn't really been a very popular character to draft in my groups though. Perhaps because for 300 points I can have Wonder Woman lasso anyone and negate their powers, not just MD figures. If the MD negation aspect of the card was what was driving his cost up to 300, and that power is about to be limited, maybe drop his points by 20 or so and see how he tests out?
|
#880
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
All of his playtests did not use that power so we have no idea what effect it currently has on his cost.
|
#881
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
EDIT: Nice quozl.
When he was tested there were few MD figures to test against. Without re-reading the tests, my guess is a lot of his value came from OM negation. If anything I think his value goes up with every MD figure added to the game, even with this nerf. I am willing to go under the advisement of CRB and see how it goes. If he starts playing over cost in the inevitable [redacting this, I guess?] tests that are upcoming, he may want to consider a full re-eval. Last edited by Ronin; April 17th, 2017 at 09:06 PM. |
#882
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
Didn't realize he was never tested against other MD figures. Tornado makes a good point that in the years since Strange came out a bunch of new MD figures have come along. Perhaps we should just retest him and assign a new cost based on the updated power along with what impact it has on a wider range of MD figures. A few of us could even include some [redact-amundo] in our tests.
Last edited by Ronin; April 17th, 2017 at 09:05 PM. |
#883
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
Bear in mind that, as much as there are a lot more magic users around now, they still do, and always will, make up a comparatively minuscule percentage of the figures in the game, and I'd prefer not to see a semi-iconic character like Doctor Strange priced as a counter-draft. I'd think of it a bit like Iceman - he was priced according to how he works on a normal map, so on an ice map, his natural habitat, he'll overperform a little, and that's fine.
That said, he should be tested with the change. |
#884
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
Quote:
Throwing out some other ideas, what about making the power only negate unreleased? Or sticking closer to the current power: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
".... the Cambridge ladies do not care, above Cambridge if sometimes in its box of sky lavender and cornerless, the moon rattles like a fragment of angry candy" |
#885
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
Quote:
What I like about the X Order Marker idea is that it has to be deployed tactically - he isn't just better, he doesn't just shut people down because he's there, but he does have the power to gain the upper hand. That feels much more thematic to how this kind of thing would play out in a Doctor Strange story - after all, if he were just all around better anyway and didn't have to work and actively gain the upper hand and take advantage of his opportunity, there'd be no narrative tension - as well as being a lot more fun and tactical than a passive power ever will be. Wouldn't that make for a more interesting magic duel than a passive power that just shuts his opponent's options down anyway? |
#886
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
Quote:
I actually don't think the last one I suggested is as strong as you think. How many MD figures actually have defensive powers (beyond MD itself) or powers that boost their normal attacks? ".... the Cambridge ladies do not care, above Cambridge if sometimes in its box of sky lavender and cornerless, the moon rattles like a fragment of angry candy" |
#887
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
Quote:
Also, I think the X-Marker version is actually very close to the original power - in fact, it pretty much is the original power, except only one turn each round. You may feel it's a bit too much of a change, but I can almost guarantee you it will lead to the most interesting gameplay when Strange ends up in a fight with another Magic user - plus, a number of other people already seem to be in favour of it. I'm honestly not liking any of these suggestions - they just seem to suggest fairly stagnant gameplay to my mind. They feel like they're eliminating strategic options, rather than expanding them. |
#888
|
||||
|
||||
Re: C3G Requests for Reevaluation
I disagree with most of your points, but that's fair. We'll see what others say. As I said before, I'm fine with your suggestion if we go with something like that. It's just not my favorite.
".... the Cambridge ladies do not care, above Cambridge if sometimes in its box of sky lavender and cornerless, the moon rattles like a fragment of angry candy" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any requests? | faramier321 | General | 3 | May 6th, 2010 08:05 PM |
SHIELD requests | badgermaniac | Comic Hero Custom Creations | 18 | August 28th, 2009 01:51 PM |
Custom Requests | badgermaniac | Comic Hero Custom Creations | 14 | December 6th, 2008 03:44 PM |
Any requests for me to make? | HeroscapeRulz | Custom Units & Army Cards | 10 | June 2nd, 2008 06:48 PM |