|
Heroscape Strategy Articles Heroscape Strategy Articles with discussions. Including Order Markers, Units, Game Play, etc. |
View Poll Results: good idea to add valkrill then stop heroscape? | |||
Yes, a new general is what the game needed. | 12 | 22.64% | |
no, just should have left the original generals. | 41 | 77.36% | |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
was it really a good idea to add valkrill then just stop heroscape?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Even if they did continue on with Heroscape, Valkrill seemed somewhat useless. It turned the smooth synergy of Heroscape into a cluttered mess. On the other hand, the concept of Valkrill is somewhat cool, but may have been a meaningless attempt by Wizards to promote D&D the the Heroscape audience.
Kyries, Распространение наши крылья для матери Россия! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Ballroom is well meaning, but unfortunately the cancellation before he could flesh out turned an interesting new faction into what appears to be a stupid gimmick. I am of the opinion that if it was known in advance that D3 was the last wave then we would not have and Valkrill.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
I would prefer the original generals. Then again I prefer original 'Scape. I also prefer 'Scape still running strong. In which case Valkrill would not exist. Then again maybe a 7th general that the original designers had been planning may have popped up, but who knows.
Never negotiate the truth. - Serj Tankian Trade List: Please contact with offers. http://www.heroscapers.com/community...ostcount=10010 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Nah, Valkrill didn't need to come along. I only ever use one of his units, and that one coulda fought for Utgar.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Really, every Vakrill unit makes perfect sense as Utgar. They all fit Utgar thematically, and most of they're synergies are with Utgar units. It probably would have made a bit more sense to make these units Utgar, but really, it's not that big of a deal (to me) in the end.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
this poll is a one sided argument. I agree with adding Valkrill but not ending Heroscape. Because of the situation it was stupid though. By your poll I would have to vote that it was a bad idea, so I didn't vote. Of course I respect the views that it was bad regardless.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Well met!
It is standard house rule that Valkrill is part of Utgar. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
I've never understood the hate for Valkrill.
There is a *ton* of room for a second evil general in the canon; I only with he'd come earlier. It's up to us to develop him, but I'm glad he's there. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
It may be the power of association, as Valkrill was introduced, Heroscape was cancelled. As you mentioned, Valkrill didn't have time to be developed. Personally, I wish that Valkrill hadn't been introduced. I play Valkrill as Utgar units.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Valkrill serves a good purpose in C3V units so I think he has a place now.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: was it a good idea to put a 7th general?
Quote:
Agreed. Your curiosity will be the death of you....
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would it be a good idea? | Astroking112 | HeroScape General Discussion | 11 | March 26th, 2011 03:36 PM |
Idea for Marvel General Name | Dragonranger | Marvel News | 59 | November 7th, 2010 10:32 AM |
good army idea | braxattack371 | Competitive Armies Discussion | 3 | October 19th, 2008 10:19 PM |
HS campaign - good idea? | Mr.Zolt | Maps & Scenarios | 3 | November 11th, 2006 01:28 AM |