|
HeroScape General Discussion General discussions of packaging, terrain, components, etc. If it doesn't fit in any other official category, put it here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Question re: Competitive Play and x5 and x6 Commons
Quote:
- Knights x5, Gilbert (455 points) - Heavies x5, Grimnak, Nerak (520 points) - Romans x5, Marcus, MBS, NGS (490 points) - Dwarves x5, Mogrimm, Darak (530 points) - Death Chasters x5, MBS, Nerak, Raelin (455 points) Obviously you could always add more bonding heroes instead of extra squads, but for many of these in the 450 - 550 point range (pretty tournament standard) these are the base builds you'd pick if you had a point total near where each army fits in (i.e. Thorgrim/Finn is almost always worse than the 5th squad of Knights). |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Question re: Competitive Play and x5 and x6 Commons
Quote:
As an example, I would rather play Eldgrim Alistair Gilbert KoW x3 than Gilbert Kow x5 Is it objectively better to play more knights? I don't know, but having a heavy hitter hero makes me a bit more confident in matchups that could just melt squaddies. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rock-Paper-Scissors: Competitive Play 101 | Soundwarp SG-1 | C3G Legacy | 7 | February 5th, 2021 02:07 PM |
Alternate Scenarios for Competitive Play | mad_wookiee | Maps & Scenarios | 1 | February 17th, 2020 11:29 AM |
Common Squad Limit or Cap for Competitive Play | NamibianScaper | Official Rules & FAQ's | 39 | May 14th, 2008 03:46 PM |
Order Marker Placement in Competitive Play | thaddeus p whirl | Official Rules & FAQ's | 130 | March 11th, 2008 12:14 AM |