|
C3G Legacy Library This is the archive for all the designs released in the original era of C3G. Feel free to post any figure specific questions in their individual books. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Hmm, now that we've taken away the attack whiffing penalty, any reason not to go back to the perfectly thematic Undead Resilience?
C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Yeah, the 1 fewer wound applies to everything. No leaving engagements, which works well with Ki Ki Ki, Ma Ma Ma, and he has a nice immunity to a lot of powers. I'm also just not entirely sure I like the mechanics of Undead Resilience. It's a fun power, but I'm still stuck on why exactly 1 skull rolled, and 3 skulls rolled, equal the same amount of damage, and 2 skulls rolled equals no damage. It's wonky.
Not saying I hate it, nor am I completely against it, but the no leaving engagements etc. and the immunity to 1 wound just feels accurate. If he barely gets hit, he doesn't get phased. I will say though, the UR would be a stronger defense for actual attacks, as it essentially gives him -2 wounds for most attacks, as long as he's not killed. Which I wouldn't mind. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
OK, just checking. I couldn't remember if the attack whiff was the only reason we went to different mechanics there or not. I forgot about the special power coverage (though I'd think a figure would almost always just attack him at this point anyway, given his 0 defense).
C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
That's fair. I'm not against the idea. No Leaving Engagements could be tagged with Ki Ki Ki, Ma Ma Ma if that's what we'd want to do. Though, the 1 fewer wound is cool when teamed with Obsidian, as he never has to worry at the end of the round. But I'm open to either I suppose. Giving him a little bit more survivability would be nice.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Any preference here? Whatever the majority are feeling, we can move forward with playtesting with said change.
@johnny139
@Tornado
@Viegon
@Karat
@TrollBrute
A: 1 Fewer Wound for everything Quote:
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Hmm. Hard to say without playing it.
My theory-scape is not great. First I think A then I prefer B. I guess a slight edge to B. A cloud can change its semblance, yet retain its will With the intimacy of destruction, One knows what it is to be alive The empty sky holds no reflection, for sorrow - Eslo Rudkey Last edited by Tornado; December 22nd, 2015 at 10:10 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Essentially B is giving him a bit more attack survivability, whereas A gives him all around survivability and immunity to certain specials. He could be ignoring 2 wounds from attacks, if not killed from it, or he could always be ignoring 1 wound from specials and attacks, even if they'd kill him. That's probably the best way to explain it.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
I just struggle wrapping my mind around these things without some testing.
I am going to trust your judgement here. I do like having the stalker aspect back in there and am indifferent on the LEAs. I like the idea of using UR over creating a new power but it all comes down to 'how does it play?'. A cloud can change its semblance, yet retain its will With the intimacy of destruction, One knows what it is to be alive The empty sky holds no reflection, for sorrow - Eslo Rudkey |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Each has their pros and cons really. There's really no better pick, ultimately, it's a matter of how exactly you think he should play, and what advantage you want him to have. The 1 fewer wound allows him to always shrug off the small stuff. There's a lot of specials that can cause 1 auto wound, or 1 unblockable etc. It also keeps him alive if the opponent were to roll just enough to kill him, whereas UR does not. Lastly, IMO it just makes more thematic sense that not hurting him enough doesn't phase him, whereas Undead Resilience you run into the oddness of 1 skull = 1 wound, 2 skulls = 0 wounds, and 3 skulls = 1 wound.
Taking that last part however, is where Undead Resilience shines. As odd as the logistics are, it means he'll essentially trade his ability to shrug off 1 wound specials, and his ability to survive an attack that causes just enough wounds to kill him, for a greater survivability with attacks. Attacks that roll 1 skull aren't common, so him taking that 1 wound won't happen very often. Attacks that roll 2-4 skulls are common, which means he's only taking 0-2 wounds each attack. It's the superior option for overall attack survivability. So it's really a toss up. The idea of him shrugging off 1 wound every time seems fitting, but the Undead Resilience gives him the harder to kill aspect when attacking, that he currently doesn't have(he dies pretty easily). |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
No strong preference between the defensive powers, but I'm not a fan of tacking Disengagement on to the end of Ki Ki Ki (it's just more complexity to a design that already has a lot going on, and could easily be missed by players skimming the card). So A I guess.
C3G: Taking Superheroes to a Whole New Level! C3V: The Legacy of Classic 'Scape! Viegon & Family's Classic Customs, Maps, and Battlefield Videos. Enjoy App Games? Try A Day in the Life of Atlas! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
".... the Cambridge ladies do not care, above Cambridge if sometimes in its box of sky lavender and cornerless, the moon rattles like a fragment of angry candy" |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Jason Voorhees - Public Playtesting
Yeah, I guess I can agree with that. Main things I like about the Undead one are 1) the title and 2) that it's an established power, but neither of those are enough to sway things overall for me.
C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Book of Robin (Jason Todd) | johnny139 | C3G Legacy Library | 120 | July 6th, 2019 04:18 AM |
Freddy vs. Jason | Tornado | Custom Units & Army Cards | 7 | December 13th, 2013 04:17 PM |
Jason Voorhees Figure? | Blackrock | Custom Units & Army Cards | 6 | October 27th, 2007 04:27 PM |
Should Jason be banned | Fallen Templar | General | 17 | August 23rd, 2006 08:04 AM |