Doctor Strange

[MrNobody]

Yea

[Ericth74]

This passes on to final editing

[IAmBatman]

@Karat @Ronin for wording checks when y'all can

[Karat]

Only thing I question is if we need the "up to 1" language in EoA. Like you'll more than likely always want to and it's a may ability already.

[IAmBatman]

I like it as is just because this way it's clear you can choose to view and not move any markers. Otherwise I'd worry that folks would think they could only view if they were going to move at least 1 marker.

[Yodaking]

We just waiting on Ronin to weigh in here before carding him?

[IAmBatman]

Seems like it, yeah.

[Ronin]

I'm alright with "up to 1".

Would favor an MD wording more like what we're trying to do with Battle Hardened - I know that one hasn't quite gone On Deck yet and we'd need to update Enchantress.

Something like:

When an enemy without Magical Affinity attacks Doctor Strange, he ignores all but 1 wound from that attack.

or

When an enemy without Magical Affinity attacks Doctor Strange and would inflict 2+ wounds on him, he ignores all but 1 wound from that attack.

[Karat]

Slight preference for the first style of wording.

[Ericth74]

Same, I like the first better

[japes]

Originally Posted by Karat

Slight preference for the first style of wording.

Really? weren't you the one that proposed a version of the second one for Battle Hardened?

[japes]

For reference here is where we were with Battle Hardened 1 and 2

Here is what we have for Battle HardenedIf Kalibak has 1+ wounds and an attack would inflict 2+ wounds on him, he ignores all but 2 wounds from that attack.

If Steppenwolf has 1+ wound when an attack would inflict 2+ wounds on him, he ignores all but 1 wound from that attack

SO whatever we do here we should do there as well.