How's this army?

[monkeyfish]

Okay here is an army I've been using alot lately and won a few games recently. Please comment.
Kozuke=100 pts
Syvarris=100 pts
Crixus=90 pts
Minions=110 pts
total= 400 pts

[Jormi_Boced]

Not enogh synergy.

[monkeyfish]

What do you mean?

[Jormi_Boced]

None of the units directly support any of the others.

[monkeyfish]

so?

[Cavalier]

Originally Posted by monkeyfish

so?

Don't let reaper hear you say that or we will subjected to one of his tirades on the subject.

Many HSers feel that unless units boost one another in some way you are not building your army properly. Some have VERY strong opinions on the subject...oops, didn't mean to say opinion as certain people swear it is irrefutable fact

[monkeyfish]

Okay when building my armies I like to include my favorites, synergy or not.

[Jormi_Boced]

Originally Posted by monkeyfish

Okay when building my armies I like to include my favorites, synergy or not.

Okay, you posted in the competitive armies thread and asked. So I told you. You are also lacking on range and squads.

[UranusPChicago]

Originally Posted by monkeyfish

Okay when building my armies I like to include my favorites, synergy or not.

Then why do you ask for opinions about your armies? I am not giving you a hard time, but if you like building your armies with your favorite figures then what does it matter if your army is good or not.

Cavalier, I don't know if I agree with you. A properly built army is however the general decides on building it, it does not necessarily need bonding or synergy.

However, tournaments played so far have statistically shown us that winning armies are primarily built around bonding or synergy of some sort.

[Cavalier]

Originally Posted by UranusPChicago

Then why do you ask for opinions about your armies? I am not giving you a hard time, but if you like building your armies with your favorite figures then what does it matter if your army is good or not.

Cavalier, I don't know if I agree with you. A properly built army is however the general decides on building it, it does not necessarily need bonding or synergy.

However, tournaments played so far have statistically shown us that winning armies are primarily built around bonding or synergy of some sort.

I don't dispute the wisdom of using armies with synergy. I was honestly just venting about how some posters think that their answer is the only right answer. The tirades that get thrown if someone disagrees are, to steal UD's word, epic.

[Jormi_Boced]

I just think it is funny, when someone posts something and says to comment. Then when you do they say.

So?

[Cavalier]

Originally Posted by Jormi_Boced

I just think it is funny, when someone posts something and says to comment. Then when you do they say.

So?

I too see the hummor in that