Doctor Fate (Kent Nelson) (Justice League)

[Arkham]

When I read "evenly" I immediately felt it was wrong. That's not how an average person would interpret that, and everyone else has states the version in the OP is clear. So

[IAmBatman]

I don't think "evenly" accomplishes it, but I do think there's room for the ability to be clearer. Something I figured we'd chat about in final editing, so it makes sense it's coming up now.

[Arkham]

Blasphemous!

[Arkham]

Just to be clear, since tone and intent gets lost in text sometimes, I was just implying when I read "evenly" I would play that wrong just at face value. And then the rest of my post on "everyone else seems to think what's in the OP is clear", was in response to YK's original post saying it's not very clear or easy to understand. Not a response to the couple of posts that were mentioning redistributing etc. That verbiage seems decent.

What if we added an "as possible" to the evenly(or equally?) approach like so:

MYSTIC ORDER
Instead of Doctor Fate's move phase, you may roll a d20. On a 7 or lower, choose 2 to 5 Unique Heroes within 7 clear spaces of Doctor Fate. Redistribute the wounds on all chosen Heroes’ cards as evenly as possible.

Evenly/Equally "as possible" feels like it allows for the slight leeway of a 1 wound difference max between the lowest and highest amount of wounds?

[IAmBatman]

I can ride with that

[Yodaking]

[Ronin]

Dig that Mystic Order wording. OP looks good to me otherwise.

[Arkham]

I propose a vote to move to On Deck
@IAmBatman
@Tornado
@MrNobody
@Yodaking
@Ericth74

[IAmBatman]

Yea

Blurb needs a sentence or two about him and playtester stuff can be removed from the OP.

[MrNobody]

Yea

[Yodaking]

yea

[Tornado]

Yea