She-Hulk (Avengers)

[Arkham]

I propose a vote to move to Final Editing

[japes]

yea

[MrNobody]

Yea

[IAmBatman]

yea

[Ericth74]

yea

[Arch-vile]

yea

Wording:

I'm not sure about the and/or construction in the second ability. I thought we changed that on another design, but I'm not coming up with an easy wording alternative.

AIDING AVENGER
Before the ordered activation of an ally in the Avengers or Hulk Family faction, you may activate She-Hulk. If you do, that ally skips its attack phase and She-Hulk cannot be activated again this turn.

SENSATIONAL SMASH!
Instead of She-Hulk's move phase, you may choose She-Hulk and/or 1 adjacent ally. Place the chosen figures on connecting spaces within 6 spaces. If you place 1 figure, you may roll a damage die against 1 figure adjacent to it and, if She-Hulk was placed, she has -3 Attack for the rest of this activation.

"OBJECTION!"
Once per game, if an adjacent figure is activated, you may end that figure's activation.

[IAmBatman]

I think you could go with:

SENSATIONAL SMASH!
Instead of She-Hulk's move phase, you may choose She-Hulk and may choose 1 adjacent ally. Place the chosen figures on connecting spaces within 6 spaces. If you place 1 figure, you may roll a damage die against 1 figure adjacent to it and, if She-Hulk was placed, she has -3 Attack for the rest of this activation.

For that last sentence, is the -3 Attack meant to be conditional on placing only 1 figure? If not, I'd break that into two sentences and scrap the "and,".

[Arkham]

It's conditional on if She-Hulk was placed, be it just her, or her and the ally. She can toss just someone else and still attack fully.

This passes.

[IAmBatman]

Then I'd do it like so:

SENSATIONAL SMASH!
Instead of She-Hulk's move phase, you may choose She-Hulk and may choose 1 adjacent ally. Place the chosen figures on connecting spaces within 6 spaces. If you place 1 figure, you may roll a damage die against 1 figure adjacent to it. If She-Hulk was placed, she has -3 Attack for the rest of this activation.

[Arkham]

Does the change away from and/or read clearly there? I know you don't prefer that, but it makes it clear that you can choose either or both. Whereas I feel like "you may choose She-Hulk and may choose 1 adjacent ally" could be interpreted as you can't do the 2nd option if you haven't chosen the first option as well?

[IAmBatman]

Maybe this?

SENSATIONAL SMASH!
Instead of She-Hulk's move phase, you may choose She-Hulk and you may choose up to 1 adjacent ally. Place any chosen figures on connecting spaces within 6 spaces. If you place 1 figure, you may roll a damage die against 1 figure adjacent to it. If She-Hulk was placed, she has -3 Attack for the rest of this activation.

[Arkham]

I think it's the double "you may choose ____ and you may choose..." throwing me off, because it always feels like the 2nd one is a choice contingent on the 1st one. But that could just be me. Any other thoughts from others on how it reads? For me, "and/or" is as clear as it gets, but if that's something we're attempting to avoid usage of, and others feel your proposed wording is clear, I'm cool with that too. Just don't want any potential confusion on the ability intent.