Quote:
Originally Posted by Astroking112
I'd also like to encourage any Inner Sanctum members to publicly raise concerns, too, for what it's worth. Public submitters are not privy to the internal conversation, which makes the process feel opaque. Scytale does an excellent job of summarizing the discussion each time, but I think that most submitters would be happier if some of this feedback was raised earlier in the process so that they can consider it before testing and the submission. The Pre-SoV Workshop is a great thread for anyone to monitor for units that haven't yet made it to the Inner Sanctum, I think, and it'd be great to have more non-judge members speak up there to make the internal vote a bit more predictable.
|
For myself, and I know for some of my colleagues, we are very busy. Not just in our day-to-day lives, but here on this board. I do not accept that it's my responsibility to make sure that nominated units are at the point where I am ready to vote in their favor before they are even nominated. I stop by there sometimes but I can't and won't accept that it's something that should go on my "to-do" list.
Even if I did, the process of discussing the nominees with others inside the C3V is often very important in developing my own thinking. So I may go back and forth about my own vote, during the conversation.
I stand by everything I said about appreciating the work that others do here, including especially the content creators. But ultimately they bear responsibility for the quality of their work, and its suitability for the canon. Not I.
I've already offered to supplement feedback in the appropriate places. I'm sure others would, too. That's what I can offer.