[OEAO]

Originally Posted by SuperSamyon

Thanks! Looking forward to it.

Also, something that you may want to consider which would, admittedly, probably be a major undertaking and somewhat controversial, would be to use the full grading scale when reviewing figures. I see that your introduced the S scale for the top figures which is commonly used in the fighting game scene to really give the most accurate ratings as possible.

As I was reading this thread, I'm seeing people refer to things as "strong B+" or "weak A-." Because those separate classifies are not reflected in the original rating, I think you should instead simply move them up or down a class so they are no longer a "strong or weak" anything.

This would of course, cause some figures to be in classes that do not reflect their true power which is why I recommend using the additional S class ratings. As an example that would mean that some figures that were A+ would now be S and so on. It's just a great way to really show where figures are on the true power scale.

Just my two cents.

It’s certainly an interesting prospect and one that I’ll consider. Expanding the rankings outwards and utilizing the SSS, SS, and S rankings are an option; however, I do want to keep as much of a formatting similarity with the original tier list (by Jexik and Spider Poison). This would shift the As to A+s, A-s to As, etc.

Also, there are strong and weak units for nearly every grade. Separating them all out would require almost twice the number of ranks, which doesn’t seem doable.

I’m hoping to start a podcast/video series in the fall about competitive scape. I’m still figuring out all the logistics, but one of the things I plan on covering is the rankings.