Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyrgard
Would the judges consider a power that allow to put a specific treasure glyph directly onto a card (among the treasure glyph already existing, not a new one) ?
The main issue, I believe, is that some player could not own the glyph, forcing them to proxy it to play a card with such power.
I feel it is not a strong issue as :
- a glyph is super easy to proxy, you could even you a piece of money. What you use has no effect one the game (as opposed to proxying figures)
- the C3V already released custom glyph that obviously need to be proxied as no official version of them exists.
To be more specific, on the french forum we are currently designing another unit to submit to SoV. We have a figure with one trait, quite similar to the effect of a temporary treasure glyph (albeit permanent), and we want to allow an opponent hero that killed that figure to loot an item on the corpse of the figure, item that would grant it this power, albeit only once. So the power is basically :
if an opponent unique hero destroy X, this opponent may put Y treasure glyph on this hero card.
(where Y would be a temporary treasure glyph)
We would like to know if this sort of power would be welcomed or frown upon.
Thanks a lot in advance for your answers.
|
That is an interesting question that might incite much heated debate within the Sanctum.
Personally, I have not made up my mind, which means that at the moment I am open to the possibility. However, that does not mean I would necessarily be okay with it by the time an induction vote came along.
It does seem to be a pretty elegant solution for some thematic powers, however.
Are you guys still planning to submit that Minotaur?