Deadeye Dan Vs. Sudema

This is an example of two figures whose price disparity makes no sense to me. Both are niche figures, both filling very similar niches, but one costs 60 points while the other costs 140 points; one fits nicely into lots of armies without being overpowering, while the other is very difficult to fit into an army without seeming ineffective.

Now, I know that on first glance, it might seem like Sudema is more powerful than Deadeye Dan. Sudema has one more life and one more defense than DED. More importantly, she has twice the chance of destroying a hero (D20 roll of 17+) as DED (D20 roll of 19+), and Sudema has a 2/3 chance of killing squaddies, whereas DED only has a 50% chance of killing (small or medium) squaddies (but also to wound small or medium heroes).

Now, even though Sudema's raw stats are better than DED's, Sudema has to expose herself to engagement much more so than DED, in order to utilize her full niche potential-- that means that she can be bogged down by multiple low-cost squaddies and taken out by long range units fairly easily, or even multiple attacks from melee units. DED, by contrast, can sit comfortably behind a melee screen and pick off targets from afar, only fearing ranged units that make it past his meat shield (or, perhaps, Laglor-enhanced ranged units).

My estimation is that Sudema's statistical superiority is pretty much offset by her relative vulnerability-- she has a higher probability of succeeding with her specials, but will have fewer chances to activate them. I really see Sudema as just the melee version of DED, so it really befuddles me as to why she costs more than twice the points of DED.

I don't know that I would price her at 60 points-- her ability to move and attack* does help in a pinch-- but 80 point seems about right... I think people would still choose Raelin over her most of the time.

*yes, I know DED can move and attack, but not with his specials, and not very effectively.