I think I had my reply open for a while so your list hadn't gotten included yet! Technically since it's only 5 cards, which would you prefer I include: Beakface Sneaks or Quorick Warwitch?
I relate to this so much. There's like 2 designs that I would even consider removing, and even then, I wouldn't want that, so much as just a slightly reworked design, now that we have years of hind sight.This was very difficult. I don't even think there are 5 cards I would exclude.
1) Ashi-Dhulu
2) Dreadgul Raiders
3) Tomoe Gozen
4) Crypt Guardian
5) Bol
I would attempt to barter with this malevolent spirit to see if I could find a way to keep more...
1) Ashi-Dhulu
2) Dreadgul Raiders
3) Tomoe Gozen
4) Crypt Guardian
5) Bol
I would attempt to barter with this malevolent spirit to see if I could find a way to keep more...
Your incisive and fruitless attempts at bartering have angered the spirit. How dare a mortal treat with the likes of it! They've eradicated your five picks from existence, granting you only the option of saving three additional units.
I can think of 5 figures I'd want to mod before letting them back in and I think most people would agree with me on those changes.
~Dysole, thinking the one that most people would guess is the one that would be the most controversial
I can think of 5 figures I'd want to mod before letting them back in and I think most people would agree with me on those changes.
~Dysole, thinking the one that most people would guess is the one that would be the most controversial
But to be fair I think the ratio of would change/wouldn't change is higher for classic than C3V. There's a whole cottage industry for classic redesign, not so much for C3V. Though your comment does make me curious.
I like all of these. I'd change the Cather in a different way, but this works well enough. Overall I think these are really conservative, which I think is usually the better way to handle long standing, well established things.I can think of 5 figures I'd want to mod before letting them back in and I think most people would agree with me on those changes.
~Dysole, thinking the one that most people would guess is the one that would be the most controversial
But to be fair I think the ratio of would change/wouldn't change is higher for classic than C3V. There's a whole cottage industry for classic redesign, not so much for C3V. Though your comment does make me curious.
My changes.
Spoiler Alert!
Arashara Goshiri - Drop to 160 points (maaaaybe 150).
Cathar Spearmen - Increase points to 90
Crypt Guardian - Change Royal Escort to "Undead King or Undead Queen or Guard"'; Braxas bonding is okay I guess but it just itches me that Royal Escort only refers to Queens and not Kings (this is probably my most controversial change)
Kantono Daishi - Remove counter strike. It just feels really weird on a ninja and is completely unnecessary to the design (maybe make him like 10 points cheaper to account for that)
Tomb Skeletons - Drop to 30 points
~Dysole, who thinks the only big classic changes she'd want is combined attacks to follow the yari wording and 7K to get disengage
Pricing affects Common designs quite a bit more than a Unique design. Raising the price of the Cather makes it harder to fit as many of them into an army, and that makes them less efficient. Sometimes the only thing a design needs is a price increase, because everything it does it working as intended, but it's a little too efficient at the price it currently has. The opposite can also be true, such as the Obsidian Guards, which are a fine design, but cost almost double what they should.Do point changes really count though? I thought you meant design changes. I just play almost exclusively Delta... the delta army builder allows me to setup fun home games for friends who don't play and know the armies will be mostly balanced without too much thought