ALEXAN2507
Doesn't Drink the Kool-Aid (Eats the Catsup)
I missed one
Spoiler Alert!
Might wanna spoiler the screengrabs, Alex - we usually try to keep the language pretty clean around here.
Yeah it was a direct rip of the text. Makes sense about wanting to avoid that when it comes to some of the more unique named powers out there.
Oddly enough I looked at Daimon Hellstrom and Kristoff von Doom when working on the power. Somehow still didn't process the Hellfire Spell name thing.
Since his range is for his Hellfire powers, I could actually see dropping his range to one (and dropping the points as well, to encourage spell buying).
NAME = BRIMSTONE
SECRET IDENTITY = JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN
SPECIES = DEMON
UNIQUENESS = UNIQUE HERO
CLASS = CREATURE
PERSONALITY = VENGEFUL
SIZE/HEIGHT = MEDIUM 5
LIFE = 5
MOVE = 6
RANGE = 1
ATTACK = 5
DEFENSE = 5
POINTS = 190
CREATURE OF HELLFIRE
Brimstone may cast Hellfire Spells as if he had the Magical Defense special power. While Brimstone is casting a Hellfire Spell, whenever a special power on an Army Card or glyph refers to the Magical Defense special power, it refers to this special power as well.
EVERYTHING BURNS
Before taking a turn with Brimstone, you must roll 1 unblockable attack die against all figures adjacent to him.
MAGIC RESILIENCE
When Brimstone rolls defense dice against an attack from an opponent's figure that has the Magical Defense special power, if at least one blank is rolled the most wounds Brimstone can take for this attack is one.
SUPER STRENGTH
Okay, here's my counter-arguments and thoughts.Spoilered for bad language
Spoiler Alert!
I guess I just saw it more as a fun easter egg, like when they have a random character in the MCU have the name of a more obscure super-hero or something like that.The main thing with Duke was it was just like, it wasn't, yknow
Duke
It felt like "hey we have a black character let's just say it's Duke Thomas"
Like you could've said it was Luke Fox and it would have made about as much sense
You have "Wonder Woman" in the last power where it should say Artemis.
I'd suggest making that clear in the text so that people like me who don't know her character can still understand her, but simply making the image of the Mistress Marker an axe should probably solve those difficulties.Mistress is the name of her axe, yes.
Just a clarification of intent - when figures leave an engagement with her and she has her axe, did you intend:
1) For the unblockable attack dice mentioned in Warrior of Bana-Mighdall to be two unblockables in addition to and separate from normal LEA attacks, or,
2) For it to simply increase the number of dice rolled for leaving engagement attacks by one (which is quite a bit weaker and in which case I suggest looking to the Knights of Weston/Catman for wording).
Also, is it meant to work against figures who avoid LEAs? The intent doesn't feel entirely clear to me here.