Seems like a good opportunity for people to discuss splitting pledges to get exactly what they want/need for a price that’s more budget friendly.Yes lots of extra figures but there will probably be a good secondary market for them, I assume anyway.
I'm in for two, I would throw in for more if its on the edge. Two is all I need though.
The exclusive content from the HeroQuest campaign is up to about $850 on ebay right now. I could see the two exclusive figures from HS AoA going for $100.
I’m just the opposite. Even if I can afford something, I won’t buy it just to have it. I’ve never been motivated by exclusives or add-ons. In fact, most of the time, it’s just too much.It's a great question and there is definitely a strong psychological aspect to collecting. I do believe that the mental elements that drive a person to be a compulsive gambler are the same elements that drive a person to make irrational purchase decisions for the things they collect. Hence why paying outlandish prices for exclusives is so engrained in our hobby culture.
It's why I think eventually loot crates and collectable card games may face the same scrutiny as gambling sites since so often these items are purchased for their second hand market strength. I've often argued that Kickstarters in some way are also by nature somewhat predatory given that there is very much a culture of backing Kickstarters without ever having an intention of playing the game. The phrase "FOMO kicking in" is a rebranding and more pleasant way of saying "addiction kicking in." Addiction tied to spending leads many down a path of financial instability which is why I'm always advocating against addictive or FOMO spending since once someone starts, it can be hard to stop.
It shouldn't be too surprisingly to any of us that those who have a propensity towards addictive spending on their hobby cannot then fathom someone making the decision to not spend money on an item even though they love it.
In fact, most of the time, it’s just too much.
Well, I mean there’s no Taelord in this set. If Taelord was included, we would have funded by now!I could (should) probably learn a thing or two from the GB school of finance.
The odd thing is that gamers will gripe about the tiniest shift in price all the time. But you look at these big multimillion dollar KS campaigns and you see that they have all-ins coming in at $600+ dollars. You think “that’s ridiculous, who’s going to pay that?” Then you find out that over 70% of their backers were all-in, and you realize that there is a lot of money out there just waiting to be spent on frivolous things.In fact, most of the time, it’s just too much.
This is how I feel about the all-in kickstarters that give you 12 boxes of extra miniatures and expansions, etc. If it takes me more time to get it all out and sort through than it does to actually play I’ll either never touch it or I’ll pull out the base game box and the extra stuff will sit.
I do realize the irony of this statement on a Heroscape forum.
I always assumed he bought those when Toys R Us (RIP) sold the RotV set as a "buy one, get one free" deal, so he only bought, uhhh.... 21 sets? Totally normal amount.And remember when Heroscape first came out, one of our forum members bought 42 copies of ROTV. Not to part out and sell on eBay. He just bought them to own them and stack them in his basement.
I think an overlooked part of why a lower buy-in is so useful in a campaign is that so often you can get people to do the initial buy-in as an impulse buy and then a lot of them will convert to the higher amount over time by spending more time around the campaign, whereas if the initial buy-in feels too high, they'll have more of an ability to just walk away.
Seems like a good opportunity for people to discuss splitting pledges to get exactly what they want/need for a price that’s more budget friendly.Yes lots of extra figures but there will probably be a good secondary market for them, I assume anyway.
As an example, I could care less about the hex terrain. I have enough to build a summer home on lake Texoma. All I really want are 2 of the factions, and some walls.
There doesn’t seem to be much incentive for people with a ton of terrain to purchase more than 1 set.
See this is more of what we need. All of the people who aren’t backing it because they don’t want all of it, could band together and get the portions they want or need, and split the price burden.Seems like a good opportunity for people to discuss splitting pledges to get exactly what they want/need for a price that’s more budget friendly.Yes lots of extra figures but there will probably be a good secondary market for them, I assume anyway.
As an example, I could care less about the hex terrain. I have enough to build a summer home on lake Texoma. All I really want are 2 of the factions, and some walls.
There doesn’t seem to be much incentive for people with a ton of terrain to purchase more than 1 set.
I may be willing to split some costs to get only the terrain, because I have none since I gave my whole collection to a friend a long time ago.
See this is more of what we need. All of the people who aren’t backing it because they don’t want all of it, could band together and get the portions they want or need, and split the price burden.Seems like a good opportunity for people to discuss splitting pledges to get exactly what they want/need for a price that’s more budget friendly.Yes lots of extra figures but there will probably be a good secondary market for them, I assume anyway.
As an example, I could care less about the hex terrain. I have enough to build a summer home on lake Texoma. All I really want are 2 of the factions, and some walls.
There doesn’t seem to be much incentive for people with a ton of terrain to purchase more than 1 set.
I may be willing to split some costs to get only the terrain, because I have none since I gave my whole collection to a friend a long time ago.
I’m interested, but I do want walls if I can get them from somebody who doesn’t want them.
Exactly! This! I've never been part of a kickstarter, but I was surprised when they offered only the one huge chunk of product. Thought going by tiers was a given. Having different offerings would maybe encourage some (like myself) to purchase more of certain offerings, and thereby show AH which are more popular.I think an overlooked part of why a lower buy-in is so useful in a campaign is that so often you can get people to do the initial buy-in as an impulse buy and then a lot of them will convert to the higher amount over time by spending more time around the campaign, whereas if the initial buy-in feels too high, they'll have more of an ability to just walk away.