|
C3G2.0 Dossier Database Database of all released designs in C3G 2.0 |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Quote:
Resources and Rulings
Credits
Would I want it to be everything I love...sure...but that's just not realistic so I'm going to focus on finding things that will make me unhappy and work on fixing those. Last edited by japes; August 17th, 2023 at 02:32 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Looks good overall here.
![]() I'll float the idea of Pilot as a keyword one more time, just to check for any interest. ![]() Worth noting that it's Griffin, not Griffen, just before you do too many of these with the other spelling! CLOBBERIN' TIME Before The Thing’s Attack Phase, you may choose an allied Adventurer or Scientist Hero within 4 clear sight spaces of him and add 1 to his Attack Number for each wound on the chosen figure has. If The Thing adds 4 to his Attack Number this way, he may take two Normal Attack Actions this activation. Small changes I might make. C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
![]() DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Quote:
second, ah thanks...looks like I did get it right in one of them at least. third, no opinion there as I'm not completely sure what "clear" sight means going forward. Would I want it to be everything I love...sure...but that's just not realistic so I'm going to focus on finding things that will make me unhappy and work on fixing those. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Quote:
![]() Would I want it to be everything I love...sure...but that's just not realistic so I'm going to focus on finding things that will make me unhappy and work on fixing those. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
I'm in favor of the Pilot keyword being a thing. Just because Thing won't often want to be in a VDO due his power set here, he should still be able to fly a plane better than someone who wasn't a pilot.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Quote:
![]() Just wanted to be clear that I'm not voting against him getting a Pilot tag. Would I want it to be everything I love...sure...but that's just not realistic so I'm going to focus on finding things that will make me unhappy and work on fixing those. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Oh, I wasn't in favor of adding planes myself but now they are here so I'm going to design accordingly.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Any more comments here?
Particularly the Clear sight thing Bats mentioned. Would I want it to be everything I love...sure...but that's just not realistic so I'm going to focus on finding things that will make me unhappy and work on fixing those. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Wasn't Ronin concerned with having multiple attack actions vs. attacking multiple times per attack action? I see he's viewing the thread, so half-expecting to be ninja'd.
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
I didn't jump on this one as quickly because he's (surprisingly) way more of a thinker than the other two. Invokes phases and rolls and suchlike.
So like... definitely one where I expect some back and forth to nail things down. Quote:
1. I think the timing of the power is kinda questionable but it made sense to me that if you gave him just an attack phase he'd still be able to use it. So I put it as kind of a floating thing in the phase itself. Obviously if we didn't want that to ever be a thing you could change up the timing a bit. I think as-is it's less ambiguous than a "before the attack phase" trigger if we want him to get it if he ever got a just-attack-phase activation though. 2. You could define multi-attacks as more attacks per action or as more actions per phase. I've gravitated toward the former because, as I understand it, SAs are meant to work by multiple attacks per special attack action. That said, I guess characters that can mix normals and specials (Diamondback, etc.) do challenge that a bit. On Rock Wall Defense 4... I'm cool with "avoids" here. I think I've been going "does not take" but "avoids" gets there more quickly and scans well. Do we want RWD4 to work if he rolls 4 shields, or if he ends up with 4 blocks in his results? |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
Thoughts, feelings, concerns?
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Thing (Ben Grimm) (Fantastic Four)
I do think you’re right that powers that grant you a normal and special attack within the same phase put some serious kinks in that system. It might be worth braking and looking at how we want to handle a typical multi-attack SA (and maybe like…a Queglix-style thing) in conjunction with this?
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Book of Brothers Grimm | Dr. Jekyll | C3G Legacy Library | 55 | March 29th, 2023 03:16 PM |
The Book of The Thing (Fantastic Four) | Griffin | C3G Legacy Library | 233 | February 10th, 2022 12:17 PM |
The Book of Mister Fantastic | Griffin | C3G Legacy Library | 219 | February 10th, 2022 11:36 AM |
Fantastic Four En Espanol | Onacara | Other Media | 3 | January 1st, 2008 09:07 PM |
The Fantastic Asian Wedding | Ugly-Caco | Marvel Discussion | 2 | June 13th, 2007 12:00 PM |