|
Heroscape Strategy Articles Heroscape Strategy Articles with discussions. Including Order Markers, Units, Game Play, etc. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#325
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Elementals Strategy and Discussion
Quote:
|
#326
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Elementals Strategy and Discussion
screwDriver, I'm making a point of disagreeing not simply because you brought it up, but because it's become a common pattern I've seen in tournament play. To my knowledge, people have played 6+ Fire elementals at a tournament only six times so far. Three of those times, they were played alongside lava-immune heroes. It's probably worth noting that the three armies that didn't have lava-immune heroes had winning records, and the three that did, didn't.*
You're right, of course, that all high-defense figures can whiff, and that he has a chance to take down some ranged figures. My point is simply that he's not as strong of an investment as more elementals, or as one of the other figures I've mentioned. As you say, it's all about playing the odds, and those other options are going to tilt matchups in your favor more consistently. * I'm not positive retlaw had a losing record with Brunak/Iron Golem/Kurrok/Fire Elementals at GenCon, but I think he told me he did. |
#327
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Elementals Strategy and Discussion
I hope to get a pack or two of the Elementals eventually. I already have Kurrok, but I haven't used him once because I don't have any elementals. Would just two of each elemental be alright if I use some ranged support? I haven't had any playtime with them, nor have I read any reports on them. The only time I saw any elementals used was in Legoboy and Captain Canuck's D&D battle, but even then they didn't do much.
|
#328
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Elementals Strategy and Discussion
Quote:
That only leaves you 70-220 points in a 400-600 point army. |
#329
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Elementals Strategy and Discussion
@Filthy the Clown, don't worry about me thinking you don't like Brunak or the likes. I think it's pretty obvious that it's not about whether we liked the hero/squad or not but rather if they'll work with the army on the table. I see your point. A hero with more than 3 lives would be able to withstand at least 2 whiffs from a common 3 wound attack while Brunak goes down in the first whiff. Good point.
@Dok, that's interesting statistics about the FE-centered armies. For the sake of simplifying the discussion, I'll just concentrate on Brunak and FEs. Let me see... instead of Brunak, we can have 3 FEs. With 3 FEs and Kurrok, we gain 3 SIs, 3 attacks, plus tactical advantages due to wider area coverage or strategical deployment. That's an outright 6 attacks. And defensively speaking, we are rolling 3 times, 1 for each life. That, against Brunak's 1 attack and relying on chance to make a second one plus a single whiff that may cost all 3 lives in 1 go. I think I beginning to understand your view about investment value. And it is valuable lesson learned. |
#330
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Elementals Strategy and Discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Heroscape Strategy Discussion Section!?! | Ultarium | Scapers Online | 12 | September 12th, 2007 07:03 PM |
Map Strategy | nonexistantnonexister | Maps & Scenarios | 14 | September 7th, 2007 06:06 PM |
Index: Unit Strategy and Discussion | Euryon | Heroscape Strategy Articles | 23 | March 4th, 2007 06:54 PM |
strategy | heroscapewanabchamp | HeroScape General Discussion | 4 | February 23rd, 2007 12:46 AM |