Leprechaun

[Arkham]

I propose a vote to move to On Deck.
@Ericth74
@Karat -
@Yodaking -
@Tornado -
@japes -

[Ericth74]

yea

[japes]

yea

[Yodaking]

yea

[Karat]

Still not satisfied with the wording her or am I sure why we are calling out combat dice since we already defined attack and defense dice in the rulebook. I'd still recommend "2+ attack or defense dice" here but not a reason to really hold this going On-Deck so....abstain

[Arkham]

Originally Posted by japes

I had to check the OP but my order is the same with OP, "2+ combat dice for an attack or defense", my favorite

Originally Posted by Karat

Your second choice is my first then.

Perhaps you were intending to reply to Bats not japes(who was the message prior to yours), but I went with what I interpreted you said was your first choice, rather than what was in the OP(most favored). So idk what else to go with. Feels like a lot of splitting hairs.

After Leprechaun or a figure within 4 spaces rolls 2+ combat dice for an attack or defense, if all dice show the same result, inflict 1 wound on either the attacker or defender.

[Karat]

Originally Posted by Arkham

Perhaps you were intending to reply to Bats not japes(who was the message prior to yours), but I went with what I interpreted you said was your first choice, rather than what was in the OP(most favored). So idk what else to go with. Feels like a lot of splitting hairs.

Sure. My first choice was what I put in my edits which was simply "for combat" but that got kickback so my point is more that it seems silly to add extra words when a shorter version is rulebook defined and maybe even a little more clear. To illustate:

...2+ combat dice for an attack or defense,

vs

...2+ attack or defense dice,

I also feel like it flows a little better but you're right it is splitting hairs which is why I did not cast a nay vote.

[Yodaking]

I also felt that part read weird when I looked at the card earlier. But then I saw that was the first couple of posts of discussion on the design so I didn't say anything. I would support Karat's last take on it.

[japes]

My issue was more the trying to say Combat Dice without specifying Attack or Defense so removing Combat Dice from the equation is fine by me.

My first and second choices were very close. I almost swapped them.

[Arkham]

updated

Also FYI: Made a slight tweak on the wording since I was in there, noticed it wasn't quite as intended. Changed LotI to also account for Freddy's rolls, not just Jason. "a defeated figure on your team" to "a figure in your army on its card". Let me know if that's not worded right.

[Karat]

Originally Posted by Arkham

updated

Also FYI: Made a slight tweak on the wording since I was in there, noticed it wasn't quite as intended. Changed LotI to also account for Freddy's rolls, not just Jason. "a defeated figure on your team" to "a figure in your army on its card". Let me know if that's not worded right.

On your team is the new in your army so you'd want "a figure on your team that is on its card".

[Arkham]

updated