The Book of Anti-Monitor

[Ronin]

Wasn't joking at all, that's how I pick 'em.

Not really necessary in a normal game where I don't know which OM is which, but when I'm solo-scaping and know where the OMs are, an actual random element needs to be introduced.

[japes]

Originally Posted by Ronin

Wasn't joking at all, that's how I pick 'em.

Not really necessary in a normal game where I don't know which OM is which, but when I'm solo-scaping and know where the OMs are, an actual random element needs to be introduced.

That makes sense. I was thinking more of the two player version where you mix up his Markers and pick one and then trustingly hand him back the others to place on the same cards.

[Jaur0n]

I guess the rules lawyer in me has a problem with the word random when I'm pointing exactly to the one I'm removing, especially if the card only has one. That said until a 4 sided dice becomes available with 1-3 and X on it, I'm going to just get over it and point.

[Tornado]

I still contend it should be random as it states but play it however your group agrees on.

I would not suggest scooping up anyone else's OM's.

[TrollBrute]

Originally Posted by Jaur0n

I guess the rules lawyer in me has a problem with the word random when I'm pointing exactly to the one I'm removing, especially if the card only has one. That said until a 4 sided dice becomes available with 1-3 and X on it, I'm going to just get over it and point.

Blame Classic 'Scape for the 'random' usage. I think the intent is that it's random in that you don't know for certain exactly which OM it is.

[Tornado]

But you do know which card it is on. That is why I always go full out random.

[isherlock99]

Might be worth noting that the figure used is specifically from the Crisis Anti-Monitor Action Pack. Also, the figure is usually only listed as #225 / Anti-Monitor, as the name variations aren't found on the dial of the figure, but in the pack's accompanying rulebook.