Public Design Workshop 2.0

[Lord Zed]

Originally Posted by IAmBatman

Here's the template for One-Shots:

Looks like you're at least missing the Requirements on yours, which are a pretty important part of them.

Nice, I have updated the structure. Hopefully I can fill in some of those blanks further down the road.

[IAmBatman]

So under the rules, when one-shots are used, they're automatically removed from the game (one-shots - single use). So you can streamline some of the language a bit, like so:

QUIPPY REMARK
When an enemy within 2 spaces rolls a d20, you may add or subtract 2 from the roll.

(notable stuff - we attribute rolls to figures now, and opponents are the other players so they're not within any spaces of your figure anyway. Result is the final number, so it can't be modified, so you have to do any additing or subtracting to the actual roll).

Should it be within 2 clear spaces?

Wondering what the requirement should be here. Figure with the Sarcastic Personality?

[Tornado]

Was looking at a card with Relentless personality and thought that would make for a great requirement. Just not entirely sure what the power should be.

[Yodaking]

At first I was thinking Relentless could be a piling on of attacks, but we seems to have a lot of attack output boosting effects. So maybe Relentless could be more of a drive to keep going when others would have failed, so a chance to ignore 1W or something?

[Tornado]

Or something like Warrior Engagement to keep someone close.
Maybe like Extend, take a wound for a turn or attack.

[IAmBatman]

I think for One-Shots, like Story Cards, it's worth figuring out what story you want to tell first, and then fill in mechanics from there. Just having a random rolodex of abilities you can add-on is less interesting, IMO.

[Lord Pyre]

I personally would be pretty excited about some go to 5/10 point filler one shots for army building so you’re not always bringing a skrull

[MrNobody]

I think a good way to hit a middleground would be to keep them limited, and like Bats said, make sure they each tell a story. Having one that’s linked to Flying, one that’s linked to each symbol ability (and then maybe one that’s linked to having no symbol abilities?) would be a cool way to ensure that pretty much every team has access to one without flooding the market.

[IAmBatman]

Yeah, don't get me wrong, I'm not against them existing, I just want there to be clear theme beyond them existing that adds something to the story of the game.

[Lord Pyre]

Originally Posted by MrNobody

I think a good way to hit a middleground would be to keep them limited, and like Bats said, make sure they each tell a story. Having one that’s linked to Flying, one that’s linked to each symbol ability (and then maybe one that’s linked to having no symbol abilities?) would be a cool way to ensure that pretty much every team has access to one without flooding the market.

Yeah that’s the way I’d do it,