C3G FAQ and Errata - Page 2

hi1hi1hi1hi1 · #13 November 11th, 2010, 02:40 AM

Ok that's fair enough. I stopped buying Heroscape before the first DnD figures, so it's not really an issue for me. I do like to think that it should be mostly compatible. I understand there will be some issues however.

IAmBatman · #14 November 11th, 2010, 02:50 AM

Yeah, they released the Death Knights after we released Grundy and Wolverine.

Xn F M · #15 November 11th, 2010, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hidicul

When using Death Knights of Valkrill with C3G units, you may not use thier bonding power with C3G figures (such as Wolverine.)

Fixed.

I don't see any reason to prevent them from bonding with the classic figures they were designed to work with.

And please, please get rid of that red text.

IAmBatman · #16 November 11th, 2010, 03:19 PM

Wait ... what? Who was designed to work with whom? Wolverine and Grundy were designed before we knew anything at all about the Death Knights (and had we known, we probably would've changed their personalities to avoid this issue). And the Death Knights, I can assure you, were designed without taking a single C3G figure into account. Not sure what you're talking about here ...

Xn F M · #17 November 11th, 2010, 03:55 PM

The way it's worded in the first post, when you're playing with Deathknights and C3G figures you can't bond with classic figures with the Relentless personality. Looking at my post though it is a bit unclear . . . . I'll fix that.

IAmBatman · #18 November 11th, 2010, 04:06 PM

Yeah, I already posted my thoughts on that bit on the first post. That said, I do think combining the two should not be recommended, for good reason. (But it's silly to think it's something we could make a rule on).

Hidicul · #19 November 12th, 2010, 04:12 PM

OK, I'll just put that it's not recomended to use the bonding power with C3G figures. I'll also change the color back to black, I was emulating the official FAQ being red but it was nothing I was set on. Also Bats, if you can PM me an example of the layout you want I'll gladly make any changes. I was mainly getting everything down so it would be easier to edit later since it is alot of bouncing around the threads for the info.

IAmBatman · #20 November 12th, 2010, 04:18 PM

No need to pm - I think you should just list the characters alphabetically and have spoiler text hiding the errata and FAQs of each to make it easy to find what you're looking for.

Hidicul · #21 November 12th, 2010, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IAmBatman

No need to pm - I think you should just list the characters alphabetically and have spoiler text hiding the errata and FAQs of each to make it easy to find what you're looking for.

Well I was already going alphabetically but I hadn't thought of using spoilers. That'll be an easy fix, especially since I'm working on it right now

Karat · #22 November 12th, 2010, 04:28 PM

I'm not sure if it has been brought up before, but on Doomsday's card for Evolutionary Regenration shouldn't it read:

After revealing a numbered Order Marker

Rather than:

After revealing an Order marker

IAmBatman · #23 November 12th, 2010, 04:28 PM

Ah, I missed the separation between Errata and FAQs. I think it might make more sense to just organize it via units and have one post for each unit with all Errata and FAQs for that unit listed under its name.
If people would find this more useful set up as is with separate Errata and FAQ sections, though, they should speak up.

IAmBatman · #24 November 12th, 2010, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karat

I'm not sure if it has been brought up before, but on Doomsday's card for Evolutionary Regenration shouldn't it read:

After revealing a numbered Order Marker

Rather than:

After revealing an Order marker

Find a power that lets the player controlling Doomsday reveal the X-Order Marker on his card.