Heroscapers
Go Back   Heroscapers > Official Classic HeroScape > HeroScape General Discussion
HeroScape General Discussion General discussions of packaging, terrain, components, etc. If it doesn't fit in any other official category, put it here.


View Poll Results: Do you prefer large scale battles or small?
Large battle that takes days to complete 12 12.63%
Large battles that complete in one day 33 34.74%
Small battles that take a couple hours 49 51.58%
I dont battle, I run for cover 1 1.05%
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st, 2007, 12:28 PM
djsmith djsmith is offline
 
Join Date: May 9, 2006
Location: WI - Milwaukee
Posts: 252
djsmith has disabled reputation
Big maps vs. small maps. and Heroscapes original intent.

I don't post all that often, and I prefer to lurk mostly, but I have a question that has been bugging me for some time now.

When I first started playing HS, I imagined a "Battle for all Time!!!" in which huge massive armies went up against each other. In my vision, I see several days to even play the type of battles I imagined.
The whole design of HS seems to support this and it is my belief that HS was originally meant to be played along those lines.

Now I know that money constraints as well as time are a big factor for the popularity of smaller maps. Tourneys are the same, and small maps make sense. Now I LOVE the big maps, and have a hard time playing on small maps. Has the original intent of the game been lost? Was that the original intent? I would love to hear the communitys' thoughts on this.

If this has been discussed, I apologize, but I was away from this site for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 31st, 2007, 12:34 PM
Finrod's Avatar
Finrod Finrod is offline
 
Join Date: May 9, 2006
Location: TX - Houston (League City)
Posts: 2,028
Images: 3
Blog Entries: 3
Finrod rolls all skulls baby! Finrod rolls all skulls baby! Finrod rolls all skulls baby! Finrod rolls all skulls baby!
All of the above.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 31st, 2007, 12:35 PM
Metaknight's Avatar
Metaknight Metaknight is offline
 
Join Date: August 6, 2007
Location: NJ-
Posts: 3,904
Images: 11
Metaknight knows what's in an order marker Metaknight knows what's in an order marker Metaknight knows what's in an order marker
I don't think that was the orignal intend. I think it was to play on 1 master set and some expansions and have an hour or so game. This has changed with castle sieges, larger armies, and people buying more master sets.

The "battle of all time" is mostly just to sound awesome and means it collects heroes form different worlds and has them fight against each other in an all out war. Also, when all the hour battles add up it really becomes the battle of all time.

See Valhalla like never before:
Airborne Elite in the
BYZANTINE CAVE...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 31st, 2007, 12:44 PM
djsmith djsmith is offline
 
Join Date: May 9, 2006
Location: WI - Milwaukee
Posts: 252
djsmith has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metaknight
I don't think that was the orignal intend. I think it was to play on 1 master set and some expansions and have an hour or so game. This has changed with castle sieges, larger armies, and people buying more master sets.

The "battle of all time" is mostly just to sound awesome and means it collects heroes form different worlds and has them fight against each other in an all out war. Also, when all the hour battles add up it really becomes the battle of all time.
See now thats funny because I see it so differently. The game just seems designed to be BIG. Interlocking pieces, castles, flagbearers, multple unit synergy all just cries out big huge battles to me. Besides the games designers would want that because more money is made for them that way. Yes? No?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 31st, 2007, 12:51 PM
markwars's Avatar
markwars markwars is offline
Mintiest of the Minty
 
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: TX - Dallas (Denton)
Posts: 8,925
Images: 9
Blog Entries: 14
markwars wears ripped pants of awesomeness markwars wears ripped pants of awesomeness markwars wears ripped pants of awesomeness markwars wears ripped pants of awesomeness markwars wears ripped pants of awesomeness markwars wears ripped pants of awesomeness
I think the fact that there are only three order markers clearly indicates that this is a skirmish level game. Sure it's got unlimited potential to be modified for all kinds of play, but at its very core is one master set's worth of terrain and a handful of units.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 31st, 2007, 01:05 PM
NecroBlade's Avatar
NecroBlade NecroBlade is offline
"our design team knows what it's doing"
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Location: KY - Shepherdsville
Posts: 19,980
Images: 38
Blog Entries: 21
NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth NecroBlade is a man of the cloth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finrod
All of the above.
Seconded. Though the order markers, as mentioned, do limit larger games somewhat. The easy customizations that can be done to fix that, though, make it an 'all of the above' game, IMHO. There should be an option for that.

317-149
C3V Brainstorm
Pepperony - 14/09/13
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 31st, 2007, 01:07 PM
Chuckrock's Avatar
Chuckrock Chuckrock is offline
 
Join Date: January 13, 2007
Location: The Republic of Texas in Sam Houston's Territory.
Posts: 1,739
Chuckrock knows what's in an order marker Chuckrock knows what's in an order marker
The great thing about playing relatively small games is if you screw up, you have time for a couple for games.

With silly Brit games like 4ok, your only playing one game.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 31st, 2007, 01:25 PM
Snotwalker 8000's Avatar
Snotwalker 8000 Snotwalker 8000 is offline
Snot Yo Mama
 
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: MN - Minneapolis
Posts: 1,340
Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness Snotwalker 8000 wears ripped pants of awesomeness
I think the game was originally designed to be either... as any good expandable game should be. And though I've played many a battle on huge fields up to 4X8 feet in size, I mostly prefer smaller skirmishes on 1 or 2 MS size fields with around 400 - 550 sized armies.

The smaller battles allow for more games to be played... If I have a few hours free time play HS, I'd rather get in 3 or 4 games on a smaller map than one game on a bigger map with larger armies.

Plus, smaller maps allow melee units to be on more equal footing with ranged units. On the huge battlefields, melee typically is overwhelmed by the looooong marches trying to get adjacent to the ranged units running around. For example, Minions are AWESOME on 1MS + Exp sized battlefields... whereas they are simply too slow to engage the enemy on 4+MS sized fields.

Also, with smaller, quicker battles, it's easier to be more creative with army builds and take chances on less-used figures... because if you build a fun, but not necessarily competitive army, and get whomped by your opponent,... well, who cares? It was a fun battle, and now we have time left for another 2 or 3 battles where I can choose a different army type.

That being said, I still love the multiplayer huge games (again, this game is versatile in that respect), but overall I prefer the smaller, quicker engagements that allow time for more games to be played... an hour a game, for example, is just about perfect.

IMHO

SW8K

"The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." ~ Thomas Jefferson

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 31st, 2007, 01:40 PM
djsmith djsmith is offline
 
Join Date: May 9, 2006
Location: WI - Milwaukee
Posts: 252
djsmith has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snotwalker 8000
I think the game was originally designed to be either... as any good expandable game should be. And though I've played many a battle on huge fields up to 4X8 feet in size, I mostly prefer smaller skirmishes on 1 or 2 MS size fields with around 400 - 550 sized armies.

The smaller battles allow for more games to be played... If I have a few hours free time play HS, I'd rather get in 3 or 4 games on a smaller map than one game on a bigger map with larger armies.

Plus, smaller maps allow melee units to be on more equal footing with ranged units. On the huge battlefields, melee typically is overwhelmed by the looooong marches trying to get adjacent to the ranged units running around. For example, Minions are AWESOME on 1MS + Exp sized battlefields... whereas they are simply too slow to engage the enemy on 4+MS sized fields.

Also, with smaller, quicker battles, it's easier to be more creative with army builds and take chances on less-used figures... because if you build a fun, but not necessarily competitive army, and get whomped by your opponent,... well, who cares? It was a fun battle, and now we have time left for another 2 or 3 battles where I can choose a different army type.

That being said, I still love the multiplayer huge games (again, this game is versatile in that respect), but overall I prefer the smaller, quicker engagements that allow time for more games to be played... an hour a game, for example, is just about perfect.

IMHO

SW8K
All of you have very valid point there. I never thought of it that way. I think I am still a throw back to the old D&D days when a campaign lasted months. This isn't that type of game though, I know. The game's overall bulky nature doesn't allow for most people to have a map set-up for long periods of time.

I just cannot get the BIG map syndrome out of my head though. When I build or play on a smaller map, it just doesn't feel right to me. Perhaps the fact that I love building maps as much as playing might have something to do with that. Most of my map ideas need to be large in nature to complete.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 31st, 2007, 02:13 PM
southwest ninja's Avatar
southwest ninja southwest ninja is offline
Colorblind Kid
 
Join Date: August 25, 2007
Location: OH - Sheffield Lake (Cleveland
Posts: 1,814
southwest ninja rolls all skulls baby! southwest ninja rolls all skulls baby! southwest ninja rolls all skulls baby! southwest ninja rolls all skulls baby! southwest ninja rolls all skulls baby!
im a fan of 1200-3000 pt games my self. everyone i play with just prefers to be able to command a huge army. ive noticed that you have less of a chance to correct a mistake you made in smallers games, and the people i play with are still learning strategy and synergies so it gives them a better chance.

I SMOKE ROCKS!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 31st, 2007, 03:15 PM
bluekitsune13 bluekitsune13 is offline
 
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: OH - Cleveland (Parma)
Posts: 694
bluekitsune13 has disabled reputation
I usually play on maps that are 1 Master set + expansions. Rarely 2 Master sets and up. I just don't like games that drag on too long. Plus I usually spend more time assembling and tearing down the large map than I do actually playing on it! Unless you incorporate multiple armies (meaning more sets of order markers), large battles go slower than they should.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 31st, 2007, 03:34 PM
djsmith djsmith is offline
 
Join Date: May 9, 2006
Location: WI - Milwaukee
Posts: 252
djsmith has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluekitsune13
I usually play on maps that are 1 Master set + expansions. Rarely 2 Master sets and up. I just don't like games that drag on too long. Plus I usually spend more time assembling and tearing down the large map than I do actually playing on it! Unless you incorporate multiple armies (meaning more sets of order markers), large battles go slower than they should.
I actually agree with you on those points, so therfore I just must be a glutton for punishment. I have spent days building some of the maps I make. And I mean days.... I made this map once and it seriously took me 2 weeks to build, tweak, teardown, move to playing location, then rebuild.
I love every second of it. Tearing it down after playing was another story though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Heroscapers > Official Classic HeroScape > HeroScape General Discussion
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Heroscape background footer

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.