The Book of Trunks (Future)

[Lord Pyre]

Yea

[fret_gurglo]

Yea

[Karat]

This Passes

I think the wording is pretty vetted but wouldn't mind other eyes on it.

[Dr. Jekyll]

Cards are up!

[IAmBatman]

Nothing pops out at me in terms of wording (though I don't have all the Heroscape aesthetic stuff down in terms of capitalization, etc.). One thing that seems a tad off (just because it doesn't quite read as having parallel structure) is the middle power by the bullets:

SHINING SWORD ATTACK
If Trunks attacks an adjacent figure with his normal attack and at least one skull is rolled, he may either attack:
•an adjacent figure again with his normal attack, rolling 1 fewer attack die; or,
•with his Burning Attack Special Attack.

Right now you have the clauses where one is saying you attack a figure and one is saying you attack with his special attack and the flow is just a bit "meh" due to the lack of parallel construction there. I'd consider either having the first clause be "with his normal attack against and adjacent figure ...." or including the "attack" in the individual bullets rather than the lead in "attack an adjacent figure ..." or "attack with his Burning Attack Special Attack ...."

For Burning Attack Special Attack, the power doesn't super scan as "burning" since all it does is knockback figures? I'm assuming that its name and effects are in-universe accurate, though?

One thing to double check on in the index is whether that exact combination of range, attack, and mechanics have been used before, since we've definitely used that exact Knockback effect on things. I don't *think* they have, but worth double checking, as we don't want to have the same special power by different names.

[Arch-vile]

Looks like Burning Attack is a completely new power. Kinda surprising but we don't have a lot of knockback effects in our library. And yeah, it's not a burning effect, DBZ just calls every power a cool name regardless of whether it makes sense.

Agreed that this sounds a little better:

SHINING SWORD ATTACK
If Trunks attacks an adjacent figure with his normal attack and at least one skull is rolled, he may either attack:
• with his normal attack against an adjacent figure, rolling 1 fewer attack die; or,
• with his Burning Attack Special Attack.

And for the cards, it looks like precedent for the Crossover symbol is for it to go under the name (where the SI normally would be). The Doctors & Jean Gray AoA both have it there.

[tcglkn]

You can tell the logo was not designed to be scaled up above the SI font size cause it gets pretty blurry when it's the same size as the name.

[Karat]

SP updated with that change to SSA which I agree reads better.

Sounds like we just need the C/O symbol moved down to under the name and scaled down to that font size.

[Dr. Jekyll]

Them cards is updated!

[Lord Pyre]

Lookin' good!

[IAmBatman]

Looks good to me. Pre-yea for On Deck, since all of my concerns have been resolved.

[Karat]

I'm satisfied and I'm not seeing any other comments so...I propose we move to On-Deck

IAmBatman - Yea
@Dr. Jekyll - Yea
@fret_gurglo - Yea
@Lord Pyre - Yea
@LordVenoc - Abstain
@MrNobody - Yea
@tcglkn - Abstain
Tornado - Yea