Quote:
Originally Posted by TREX
Quote:
Originally Posted by quozl
Both dok and I say you would not get the bonus for Charging Assault because the door is not a figure and is only treated as a figure when it is targeted or attacked.
|
If this is the case, it is a figure, because it is being targeted and attacked. On the other sense it is a destructible "Object". In the case that the game is for fun, and the door is a pain in the butt, I personally would allow it. If I actually played games with the door anyway.
|
TREX, I think you are still misunderstanding which power we are talking about. We are talking about Kozuke Samurai Charging Assault, not Templar Cavalry Galloping Charge. Read the Kozuke card: it does not mention targeting or attacking. That is why quozl and I think the power does not work on the door.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad_Scaper
It's not a figure. There's an exception for Sword of Reckoning? Fine. "It's magic."
|
Honestly, there's no CVN-style appeal to "magic" here. The issue is not that there's two rulings in conflict and we just have to live with that. Rather, it's just that there is an area of ambuguity in the rules, and the ruling was kind of buried (available only in the front of this book, and not in the FAQ or the rulebooks) so we (or maybe just me?) had missed it.
That ruling doesn't make it 100% clear how to handle a few super-cornery corner cases (Combined Arbalest, Blood Frenzy, Zettian Targeting), but even so, it's just a matter of having a ruling and running with it; no "magic" needed.