|
C3V and SoV Customs A place for C3V and SoV customs |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#7165
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
The planet is no longer a concern. I vote up to review
|
#7166
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
A couple things. First, All Your Pie has stepped down from being an SoV Judge. We are grateful for his excellent contributions to the project.
That leaves us at seven Judges. We are going to stick with that for now, though depending on how things go we may look to recruit someone in the future. As for the Wulfings, I'm not sure I like putting Humans on Feylund more than what we had before. But I'm not strongly against it. My still stands. Which means that at 4 Yea votes to review (Scytale, Astroking112, superfrog, and wriggz), the Wulfing Hunters move forward in the process. |
#7167
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
The two suggestions I had were Feylund Wulfings or Toril Humans. Feylund Humans doesn’t mesh well so I’d actually downvote that.
|
#7168
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Clear communication is hard for me to receive sometimes. I thought I was being told to change both not 1. Feylund Wulfing is a perfectly fine thing for it to be, I'm fine with any label swapping at this point.
|
#7169
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
Yes, of *course* a unit will be downvoted (by some) because it has a problem with the canon. Make it as good as it can be, in every respect, before and not after we take it into our hidey-hole for consideration. Why should we start putting humans on Feylund with this unit? Either persuade me, or take the path of least resistance and make it work with the existing canon. |
#7170
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
I want the path of least resistance I dont have an interest in trying to persuade anyone on their aesthetic or lore perspective. I can only persuade on mechanics and data based designs. |
#7171
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Cool, if you make that change it’s an upvote from me. You do have to officially decide what exactly to submit though.
|
#7172
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
For what it's worth,
@Shiftrex
, you are a designer after my own heart in that way. I don't care to get hung up on those things early, either, and I also am happy to relabel things as needed to make them fit with the canon.
I should also have said, and I do say now, thank you for sharing this excellent custom with us. |
#7173
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Quote:
|
#7174
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
Okay, officially an upvote from me.
|
#7175
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
I'm with that change as well.
|
#7176
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soldiers of Valhalla - nominations and discussion
I had missed that the species changed to Human with the change to Feylund originally (I agree that Humans shouldn't be added to Feylund if we can help it). Now that they're Wulfing again, I have no problem with Feylund here.
to review the Wulfing Hunters. Proud Member of Platyfly!
Custom Units — Maps & Scenarios Battle Reports The Case for a VC Master Set |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|