|
C3G Legacy Library This is the archive for all the designs released in the original era of C3G. Feel free to post any figure specific questions in their individual books. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
Quote:
|
#111
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
@Karat
- I didn't understand that he could keep attacking after every normal attack (with a skull). Thanks for clarifying! I think that was making some confusion in the discussion.
With that idea in mind, what do you think about these options? SHINING SWORD ATTACK After Trunks attacks an adjacent figure with his normal attack, if at least one skull was rolled, he may attack an additional time [or “again”], either with his normal attack against an adjacent figure, rolling 1 fewer attack die with each subsequent attack, or with his Burning Attack Special Attack. OR SHINING SWORD ATTACK After Trunks attacks an adjacent figure with his normal attack, if at least one skull was rolled, he may attack an additional time [or “again”], either: • with his normal attack against an adjacent figure, rolling 1 fewer attack die with each subsequent attack; or • with his Burning Attack Special Attack. |
#112
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
We'd want again, but I like the first of what you posted there. I don't see any need for bullets here.
C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
![]() DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
So:
SHINING SWORD ATTACK After Trunks attacks an adjacent figure with his normal attack, if at least one skull was rolled, he may attack again, either with his normal attack against an adjacent figure, rolling 1 fewer attack die with each subsequent attack, or with his Burning Attack Special Attack. |
#114
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
That's got my vote.
![]() C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
![]() DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
#115
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
Seems perfectly clear to me, Sporx!
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
Definitely prefer the bulleted option. Updating with that.
|
#117
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
Take two
![]() SHINING SWORD ATTACK After Trunks attacks an adjacent figure with his normal attack, if at least one skull was rolled, he may attack again, either: • with his normal attack against an adjacent figure, rolling 1 fewer attack die with each subsequent attack; or • with his Burning Attack Special Attack. |
#118
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
Why? What do the bullets add?
C3G can be played with official Heroscape, but it's not recommended.
![]() DISCLAIMER: C3G claims no ownership of the characters or artwork used for C3G customs. All rights for the characters belong to their respective publishers/creators. C3G cards are not intended for sale, and C3G does not authorize any party to profit from C3G cards. |
#119
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Book of Trunks (Future)
It makes it more clear that they are seperate from each other.
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Book of Spider-Man (Future Foundation) | tcglkn | C3G Legacy Library | 101 | May 18th, 2020 10:03 PM |
The future of HeroScape! | Roderick2012 | General | 1 | January 9th, 2014 11:00 PM |
The future cost.... | Chachi | HeroScape General Discussion | 31 | December 22nd, 2011 07:47 PM |
In the future | wimba808 | HeroScape General Discussion | 65 | July 9th, 2006 07:07 PM |