Rulebooks and FAQ - PDF

[yamissflash]

Originally Posted by gevdarg

I've got a rules question that maybe someone can answer. Is Krug's Wounded Smash considered a special attack or a modifier to his normal attack?

The joy of winning a long-fought campaign rests on your answer...

fixed

Does the trainer of you give you the joy of a long campaign,
Or the feeling you cheated?

[gevdarg]

Maybe I'm missing something because you're making no sense. All I'm asking is whether or not Krug's Wounded Smash is regarded as a special attack or a normal attack? We need to know so we can determine whether or not Counter Strike comes into a play if he attacks a hero or squad who has the ability. Anyone else?

[Cavalier]

Originally Posted by gevdarg

Maybe I'm missing something because you're making no sense. All I'm asking is whether or not Krug's Wounded Smash is regarded as a special attack or a normal attack? We need to know so we can determine whether or not Counter Strike comes into a play if he attacks a hero or squad who has the ability. Anyone else?

And I answered you quite clearly. No it is not. If it were it would be called "Wounded Smash Special Attack". Further more, it would have a specified Range and Attack value.

Examples:
Krug, Wounded Smash and Double Attack-Not Special Attacks


Mimring, Fire Line Special Attack-A Special Attack


Notice how it has a Range and Attack value that are independent of Mimring's normal attack. Also, how the words Special Attack are part of the tittle. Those things are the defining characteristics of a special attack. If a power doesn't have those characteristics, it is not a special attack.

[gevdarg]

Cavalier, sorry if I offended you, but I was responding to yamissflash's reply and not yours. That was the first one I saw when I checked for a reponse.

Thank you for your replies. This will go into the FAQ section of my rulebook, and ny wife will not be happy about this one.

Thanks again for the clarifications. Very helpful.

[Cavalier]

Originally Posted by gevdarg

Cavalier, sorry if I offended you, but I was responding to yamissflash's reply and not yours. That was the first one I saw when I checked for a reponse.

Thank you for your replies. This will go into the FAQ section of my rulebook, and ny wife will not be happy about this one.

Thanks again for the clarifications. Very helpful.

No worries, it's all good. And I agree that yamissflash's post made no sense.

[cmgames]

Hey netherspirit!

If you are still around, could you update the FAQ link on the OP of this thread to link to the latest FAQ (9.4)? You are still linked to an old version (8.3).

~Z

[quozl]

Any chance of the new D&D Master Set rules being scanned in soon?

[Hogg]

Originally Posted by quozl

Any chance of the new D&D Master Set rules being scanned in soon?

Probably we'll have to wait until the 4th.

[Maxaman24]

Okay. My computer won't download anything, so I need to ask a question.

Me and my brother have a big disagreement. I am sure I am right. Every time we play we get into a fight about it and he ends up quitting. It doesn't say anything about it in Ticalla Juncle Rulebook and we lost our Swarm Of The Marro and Rise Of The Valkyrie Rulebook. *Ooops* Anyway, Here's the question.

If a Marden Nagrub is in the water, and another Marden Nagrub is on land right next to it, The Marden Nagrub on land DOES NOT HAVE HIGHT, Right? You know that land is a little higher than water, but not high enough to be counted as hight advantadge.

PLEASE PLEASE answer this question. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Bonecrusher]

Water tiles never count towards height. So if you have the table, and put a land tile and water tile on the table, the land tile has a height of 1 and the water tile has a height of zero. So, if I understand right, the Marden Nagrub has height advantage.

[Fencerjared]

Crusher is right, in this example the grub on land has height.

[Maxaman24]

Oh. Dangit. Now my brother thinks hes the heroscape master or something. Thanks Anyway!