Quote:
Originally Posted by Onacara
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaSilver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onacara
The "problem" with this idea is that you have taken away the line of sight on the rider by not having him on the horse.
|
The intent was that if you could target (aka see) the Horse, then you could attack the rider instead of the Horse. The issue I had was trying to make that apparent on the card using official nomenclature, which I apparently did not do.
How would you suggest I rewrite it to correct that issue?
|
But if you cant see the horse the rider could still be seen depending on the height of the rider
|
True, but this is a game not a simulation.
Some issues cannot be avoided.