View Single Post
  #194  
Old December 23rd, 2021, 04:39 PM
Alexandros's Avatar
Alexandros Alexandros is online now
 
Join Date: December 31, 2007
Location: USA - TX - Dallas (Fort Worth)
Posts: 493
Images: 3
Alexandros wears ripped pants of awesomeness Alexandros wears ripped pants of awesomeness Alexandros wears ripped pants of awesomeness Alexandros wears ripped pants of awesomeness Alexandros wears ripped pants of awesomeness Alexandros wears ripped pants of awesomeness
Re: [Pod 2] Katryn Vade (Nahiri, Fuy in Stone) - Editing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Stupendous View Post
Okay, I think it's time to circle the wagons on this one. I appreciate @Scytale 's concerns that Aspect of the Dragon needs a more clearly defined activation window in order to work cleanly with Scape's ruleset. However, I also am sympathetic to the observation that the flexibility is what currently makes the power useful. With those in mind, I'd be open to reimagining this power a bit more broadly:

Quote:
ASPECT OF THE DRAGON
When revealing a numbered order marker on Katryn Vade's Army Card, you may also reveal an "X" order marker that is on this Army Card to activate Aspect of the Dragon for the duration of the round. While there is a revealed "X" order marker on this Army Card, Katryn Vade has a size of Huge instead of what is listed on this Army Card. If Katryn is attacked and at least one skull is rolled, instead of rolling defense dice normally you may remove a revealed "X" order marker from this Army Card. If you do, Katryn takes no damage.
Obviously this ability would require a points increase, along with a potential drop in life and/or defense.

Curious what the rest of the Pod thinks about a change like this, or whether they'd prefer to remove Aspect of the Dragon entirely and workshop a completely new direction for a potential second power.
@Zetsubo @Alexandros @Skinderella @NecroBlade @Astroking112 @flameslayer93
I'm actually a pretty big fan of where you have the power. It seems clear, mechanically unique, and flavorful. That works well enough that I'm not sure we need to reinvent it.
Reply With Quote