Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
June 8th, 2018, 05:19 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
I was enjoying this, but as a participant in the last round I thought I'd sit this one out to give others a go. It's been more than a week, so I'll jump in and get it moving again.
...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 20th, 2018, 02:55 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Is the main event the Reverse the Whip one (if I have that format name right)? That changes the army-building goals fairly dramatically (and in ways I'm not that excited about, albeit without...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 20th, 2018, 01:05 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Totally fine by me... except it's not your turn. I don't remember if we formalised it, but I thought the idea was that the "winner" of one draft sets the next. That's looking like Flameslayer93 at...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 20th, 2018, 12:16 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
I think it should be up to whoever is setting the cards to define the exact format, rather than blanket rules. If someone doesn't like the current set-up, they can just wait for the next one.
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 20th, 2018, 11:46 AM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
I was pretty happy with my final army: Tul-Bak-Ra, Dund, Onyx Vipers and Death Knights x2.
Of all the unreliable powers in the pool, Frenzy is among the best and there's enough range knocking...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 19th, 2018, 06:32 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Player 1: Kee-Mo-Shi (Tier 1) (flameslayer)
Player 2: Elite Onyx Vipers (Tier 4) (Ollie)
Player 3: Blastatrons x2 (Tier 2) (BiggaBullfrog)
Player 4: Deepwyrm Drow x2 (Tier 2) (superfrog)
Player...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 18th, 2018, 07:58 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Gah, I was hoping for those Glads.
Player 1: Kee-Mo-Shi (Tier 1) (flameslayer)
Player 2: Elite Onyx Vipers (Tier 4) (Ollie)
Player 3: Blastatrons x2 (Tier 2) (BiggaBullfrog)
Player 4:...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 18th, 2018, 05:01 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Player 1: Kee-Mo-Shi (Tier 1) (flameslayer)
Player 2: Elite Onyx Vipers (Tier 4) (Ollie)
Player 3: Blastatrons x2 (Tier 2) (BiggaBullfrog)
Player 4: Deepwyrm Drow x2 (Tier 2) (superfrog)
Player...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 17th, 2018, 07:27 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Player 1: Kee-Mo-Shi (tier 1) (flameslayer)
Player 2: Elite Onyx Vipers (Tier 4) (Ollie)
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 17th, 2018, 01:19 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 11th, 2018, 01:06 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
It seems odd to be needing to argue that Kaemon is a worthwhile unit. I guess that's the fun of the drastically different metagames these small-pool drafts have. Three points, that are mostly...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 11th, 2018, 10:30 AM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
I think Players 1, 2 and 4 all have a fighting chance. 2 would probably be my pick as the army that'd come out on top.
I was undone by my relative unfamiliarity with units between about Wave 8...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 10th, 2018, 06:38 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Player 1: Nilfheim (Tier 1) (wriggz)
Player 2: Krug (Tier 2) (DS)
Player 3: Mogrimm (Tier 3) (Tornado)
Player 4: Charos (Tier 1) (Ollie)
Player 4: Kaemon Awa (Tier 2) (Ollie)
Player 3: Master of...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 10th, 2018, 05:28 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Yes in general to DS's points, but especially this. People's different opinions are what makes it not obvious what'll happen, which makes it fun.
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 10th, 2018, 04:20 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 10th, 2018, 02:17 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
I had an idea about this (and agree it'd be fun to do again): what if we come to consensus on who "won" the draft (with Kolakoski the final arbiter if needed) and that person becomes the next host...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 10th, 2018, 09:50 AM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Agreed. On further thought I think there are two primary factors for a better army from this pool, and then a lot of secondary ones: avoid Moltenclaw and get Krug. Interestingly(?), if everyone...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 10th, 2018, 09:38 AM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
A lot depends on the spread of the units within the tiers, I think.
I think the biggest spread is in Tier 1, with Moltenclaw significantly below the other options. If all the other tiers had...
|
|
Forum: Competitive Armies Discussion
May 9th, 2018, 05:57 PM
|
|
Replies: 154
Views: 15,432
Re: 16 Card Mock Draft
Player 1: Nilfheim (Tier 1) (wriggz)
Player 2: Krug (Tier 2) (DS)
Player 3: Mogrimm (Tier 3) (Tornado)
Player 4: Charos (Tier 1) (Ollie)
Player 4: Kaemon Awa (Tier 2) (Ollie)
Avoiding being...
|
