Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 29th, 2024, 09:57 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 28th, 2024, 09:37 PM
|
Replies: 157
Views: 449
Re: Brooklyn
Yup, that fixes it. One day I'll remember to do that first.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 28th, 2024, 07:50 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 28th, 2024, 07:47 PM
|
Replies: 157
Views: 449
Re: Brooklyn
Thanks. Card is missing that Brooklyn can now boost himself.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 27th, 2024, 11:08 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 27th, 2024, 11:06 PM
|
Replies: 157
Views: 449
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 26th, 2024, 08:00 PM
|
Replies: 157
Views: 449
Re: Brooklyn
Brooklyn seems to still struggle to maintain his cost and overall the Gargoyles struggle with offense. Japes and Bats suggested a small tweak to (hopefully) mitigate some of those struggles.
...
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 12th, 2024, 12:00 AM
|
Replies: 60
Views: 409
Re: Lexington
Withdrawing the vote for all three gargoyles point adjustment.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 12th, 2024, 12:00 AM
|
Replies: 107
Views: 628
Re: Broadway
Withdrawing the vote for all three gargoyles point adjustment.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 11th, 2024, 11:59 PM
|
Replies: 157
Views: 449
Re: Brooklyn
Withdrawing the vote for all three gargoyles point adjustment.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 11th, 2024, 11:58 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (final editing)
And with that I will retract the request to adjust points on the previous gargoyles. I think everything is in order for Goliath to proceed to art if someone can move him over for me please
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 11th, 2024, 01:50 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (final editing)
There seems to be enough support to go either way here. Each is getting yeas to pass the point change, but some strong arguments here as to why this shouldn't happen. I'll let it go until tomorrow,...
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 11th, 2024, 12:47 AM
|
Replies: 107
Views: 628
Re: Broadway
No rush, this can wait for a while anyway. I'm hesitate about this point reduction too.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 10th, 2024, 06:01 PM
|
Replies: 157
Views: 449
Re: Brooklyn
Arch-vile - YEA
IAmBatman - YEA
japes - ;
Karat - Abstain
Tornado - ;
Yodaking - YEA
This would mean a 10 point increase to Brooklyn.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 10th, 2024, 06:01 PM
|
Replies: 107
Views: 628
Re: Broadway
Arch-vile - YEA
IAmBatman - YEA
japes - ;
Karat - Abstain
Tornado - ;
Yodaking - YEA
This would mean a 20 point decrease to Broadway.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 10th, 2024, 05:59 PM
|
Replies: 60
Views: 409
Re: Lexington
Arch-vile - YEA
IAmBatman - YEA
japes - ;
Karat - Abstain
Tornado - ;
Yodaking - YEA
This would mean a 10 point increase to Lexington.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 10th, 2024, 01:33 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (final editing)
And Ronin suggested using markers in place of figures for Goliath. Does anyone have a preference one way or the other?
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 10th, 2024, 01:16 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (final editing)
Their costs were designed for theme more than mixing. The Trio often (as in always) are a group to themselves. But I'd be fine with this change too.[/quote]
The trio would still work at 600 with...
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 10th, 2024, 10:40 AM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (final editing)
Their costs were designed for theme more than mixing. The Trio often (as in always) are a group to themselves. But I'd be fine with this change too.
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 9th, 2024, 08:27 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (final editing)
Should this be "after Goliath uses an attack action"?
[/quote]
Yup, I'll update OP
Sounds good to me
I'm fine either way, whatever people think is best here.
Thanks
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 9th, 2024, 05:25 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 9th, 2024, 05:23 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 9th, 2024, 03:19 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
|
Forum: C3G2.0 Dossier Database
January 9th, 2024, 03:18 PM
|
Replies: 93
Views: 99
Re: Goliath (public testing)
Thanks Bats
1 - Big wins
2 - Wins
2 - Losses
2 - Big losses
Slightly more in the loss catagory, but I think that is fine. Goliath will actually be stronger with more Manhattan Clan members...
|
Forum: C3G SuperScape
January 8th, 2024, 10:50 PM
|
Replies: 385
Views: 4,039
|