| Home | Forums | Gallery | Downloads | Blogs | Events Calendar | Register | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Events: Post your HS event or find an event near you | |||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#361
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
This sounds great and i would like to attend but my son Moonwalker has a wrestling tournament every Saturday in January. Maybe i will have to catch the next event.
|
|
#362
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
So any word on doing this?
Trade Thread Check out my new customs! Critics needed!
|
|
#363
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
So any interest in the annual spring Team Tourney?
|
|
#364
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
Yeah we failed to discuss it tonight. I think DrL is going to head this one up?????????
|
|
#365
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
****. Am I?
Okay. I'll have something posted Friday. I am thinking old school side by side at about 600 points with a 250/350 split at the end of March/early April (depending on Rev's availability). Other thoughts before the thread goes up Friday? Last edited by DrLivingston : February 8th, 2012 at 01:31 AM. Reason: (Is there really not a thread already up for this...?) Doopa is Polish for awesome. |
|
#366
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
LOL....that was easy...just don't velenne it.
|
|
#367
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
Non-bonding type synergies work whether they are "friendly" or "you control."
No real reason behind this one...just thought it would be fun. AW88 ~fully expecting to get shouted down Currently playing: SmallWorld; Blokus; 3D Blokus; Stratego Dum Vivimus, Vivamus! |
|
#368
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
Is everyone down for the restricted list again this year? I think going back to side by side, but with the restricted list will yield a good result.
Dignan's Maps - Dignan's Multiplayer Maps
Competitive Unit Congress "It doesn't matter how you find the pot of gold, all that matters is that you beat the leprechauns". |
|
#369
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
Since I didn't holler loud enough last time around, the restricted list MINUS non-bonding heroes (i.e. Kaemon Awa) is my first choice.
For everyone's edification (okay, mine), where/what is the current restricted list? AW88 Currently playing: SmallWorld; Blokus; 3D Blokus; Stratego Dum Vivimus, Vivamus! |
|
#370
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
I am down with the restricted list. I think looking at the army Gladdragon and Anubianwolf88 put together shows it makes for a much different set of armies than we normally see at this event.
Here's the rules and restricted list from last year: Event Parameters:
Spoiler Alert!
We'd change the seating to side by side and I'd like change it to shared start zones as well. Debate on the restricted list is always welcome. It's an evolving meta game thing, yeah? I'm trying to think how treating all army cards in your combined team army as "units you control" could be horribly abused. (Raelin?) If we can't think of a reason not to do it, I'd like to try it. Maybe someone will bring a kickass elf wizard army... Last edited by DrLivingston : February 8th, 2012 at 12:51 PM. Reason: I know R˙chean will have a reason shoot down the "units you control" idea... Doopa is Polish for awesome. |
|
#371
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
Quote:
I think with the restricted list and teams not being able to field the same common army card, it might be workable. It would pump up some marginal units a good deal. You will need to really dig in to clarify some stuff. Like bonding: should you be able to take a turn with your partner's bonding hero? Valiant and Disciplined bonus: would both teams have to be all or nothing to enjoy those bonuses? not so bad for powerful 4th but pretty much nerfs marginal SBand. (Glads/Blasts combo would get a decent bump that they don't need.) It does make all the cheerleaders significantly more powerful, but most of the good ones are on the restricted list so...you would only get one of them across both armies. Might be interesting. Last edited by R˙chean : February 8th, 2012 at 01:55 PM. Reason: I tried to shoot it down but the restrictions we have make it plausible |
|
#372
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dallas Area "Official" Tournament structure
I think, if we did this, keeping it simple would be best. "All units in your team's army count as units you control."
So yeah, you could bond. Shared start zones I am for sure about. I think it opens things up for a different sort of map than we've seen the past few years and it sets up different dynamic - armies don't have to run to meet in the middle as they are already together. And if we go with "count as units you control", it makes those synergies work from the beginning. But mainly I want to do it from a map making aspect. How may spots? If army size is 610? 28 again? The smaller the more limited squads will be... Doopa is Polish for awesome. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Events: Post your HS event or find an event near you | |||||||