| Home | Forums | Gallery | Downloads | Blogs | Events Calendar | Register | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Competitive Armies Discussion: Discuss, critique, and build ideas for tournament-caliber armies. | |||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay i need help knowing whether this is competitive or not. If this is the wrong format let me know. I would also appreciate advice. Thanks.
Roman legionaries x2 Roman Archers x2 Sparticus Tarn Vikings Finn Marcus Decimus Gallus Fish and custard
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
I was thinking to charge in with the melee units well the archers provide cover.
Fish and custard
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
No, it's not.
I assume by your name that you're a big fan of Sparty, but if you don't have any other Gladiators in your army then there's no way to justify his 200 point price tag. The Tarns and Finn are also out of place. Marcus+Legos is a good start, though. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
Roman legionaries x2 = 100 points
Roman Archers x2 = 110 points Sparticus = 200 points Tarn Vikings = 50 points Finn =80 points Marcus Decimus Gallus = 100 points Total = 640 points Your army is trying to do a lot of things but is missing the focus you tend to find in the most competitive armies. Take Spartacus for example. He is an impressive hero, but a fair portion of his value is in inspiring other gladiators - none of which are in this army. For 110 points RotV Drake has very similar stats, is more mobile and is harder to kill at range. He's also a soldier - which brings us to Marcus. The synergy between Marcus and the Roman Legion is excellent. 200 points to get 2xLegion and Marcus is an excellent and highly competitive army core. One thing to consider is how to build on that synergy. Adding more soldiers is a great way to take maximum advantage of having Marcus in the army. Additional soldiers include the 10th regiment of foot and the Airborne Elite among others, both excellent ranged squads - which brings us to - the Roman Archers. Without some way to protect them, the Roman Archers have a tendency to die very quickly on the battlefield, rarely wielding their six dice ranged special attack. For the same points, you can trade them in for the AE, a four man squad of soldiers with greater range, a stronger attack, more defense and an easier time getting height advantage. The Tarn Vikings and Finn are welcome additions to any army. They have their uses and can force your foe to make tough decisions. If you had another squad of Legionnaires you might be better served taking them instead of the Tarn though - it gives you more focus. The 90 points you saved in going from Spartacus to Drake can be spent on Raelin and Isamu - further toughening your troops and giving you a nice and inexpensive clean up unit. So we're looking at: Roman legionaries x3 = 150 points Airborne Elite = 110 points Drake RotV = 110 points Raelin RotV= 80 points Finn =80 points Marcus Decimus Gallus = 100 points Isamu = 10 points Total = 640 points That should give you a boost in the direction of making that army competitive! ~Aldin, soldiering on |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
Your much better stuffing it full of Romans. Also, don't forget that the 10th Regiment is perfect in this build.
x3 Legos-150 x2 10th-300 Marcus-400 Zelrig-585 Isamu-595 You have a squad killer, a ranged squad, a melee squad, a cheer leader, and a crazy ninja to score some points with. This one would be best to maxamize Romans. You could try even more to excel in Romans, but that would leave you lacking in a bread/butter range unit. "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." ~Albert Einstein Tourney Record:17-10 (08/02/11) |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
Quote:
117th Boston Marathon: Monday, April 15th, 2013. Goal: 3:30:00 Actual: 3:39:41 Next Race: Boston's Run to Remember 5/26 - Half Marathon |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
Quote:
~Aldin, mindshackledly |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
Thanks for the advice
Fish and custard
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
Well me and my brother are planning on having a tournament soon. and we plan on having 800pts armies so i decided on having: Roman legions x2, , Sgt. Drake, Marcus, Airborn elite, 2x Roman archers, Charos
Fish and custard
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this a competitive army?
I would say take out Sparty and put in some more special attackers...Nilfhiem, 8000, maybe cyprien. If you don't face Soulborgs.
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Competitive Armies Discussion: Discuss, critique, and build ideas for tournament-caliber armies. | |||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post / Vote |
| A Not-So-Competitive Army | GromBloodboy | Competitive Armies Discussion | 14 | November 21st, 2009 04:54 PM |
| Me vs. a competitive army... | DBC | Competitive Armies Discussion | 3 | August 5th, 2008 09:53 PM |
| Non Competitive Army | mecha frog | HeroScape General Discussion | 5 | February 11th, 2008 05:37 PM |
| Competitive 500 pt. army | pti8 | Competitive Armies Discussion | 7 | September 18th, 2007 07:15 PM |
| 750 COMPETITIVE ARMY | BRUNAK | Competitive Armies Discussion | 13 | July 29th, 2007 11:05 AM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|