View Single Post
  #58  
Old September 19th, 2011, 05:47 PM
Nirek's Avatar
Nirek Nirek is offline
 
Join Date: January 13, 2009
Location: USA - PA- Pittsburgh (Butler)
Posts: 1,623
Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness Nirek wears ripped pants of awesomeness
Re: NHSD Columbus Ohio - 10/15/11

Quote:
Originally Posted by lefton4ya View Post
Just like a normal tourney, with enough players, you can loose a game and still win the tourney or easily come in the top 4. Also, wait to see if the Columbus crew decides to through in a bracketed semi-finals and finals for the final four - it seems like that they are leaning that way but not sure. Also if you use win difference as the top factor as opposed to winning %, if you can get in more games but loose one or two, you are better off then playing less games but being undefeated.

See An Alternative Tournament Structure: The Rolling Rumble
Quote:
Originally Posted by ollie View Post
...
Rankings are determined according to the following criteria:

A) Best win difference (number of wins minus number of losses),
B) Win percentage,
C) D20 roll.

That is, the win difference is the primary method of ranking. Within equal differences, win percentage decides the placing. If the records are identical, roll the D20 (any splits made by the D20 are for prize table purposes only).
...
Alternative ranking algorithms. Should win difference be higher priority than win percentage? (Is 5-1 better than 3-0?) When using win difference, is win percentage or number of wins the appropriate secondary criterion? (Is 6-2 better than 5-1?) Should points remaining be collated to add another criterion? (Is 5-1 with a points differential of 530 sufficiently different to 5-1 with a points differential of 450 to be worth everyone collecting that information?) Any and all of the criteria can be put into the order of your choosing to determine placings. If using win percentage, you will probably also want a minimum number of games, say three, to qualify. Anyone with fewer than this number of games adds losses to reach the total.

Strength of Schedule. Calculate the average of your opponents' win percentages. This is your strength of schedule. This can be added into the list of criteria for determining placings.
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by lefton4ya View Post
Thanks Dok. So it looks like the best ordering is:
  • Wins-Loss
  • Winning %
  • SOS based on opponent's total W-L record
Lefton4ya,

Are you sure that's right? It looks like those are the rules for the Rolling Rumble, while the front page of this tournament says we are playing a Royal Rumble. Maybe I'm mincing words.

Anyway, have we decided whether or not C3V figures from Thormun's Reprieve will be allowed? I'm aching to test out Nicholas and Thralls... I would love to do Omega and his crons, too, but it's too few points.
Reply With Quote