Should Jason be banned

[Fallen Templar]

This is an unbiased survey about the said topic please vote and mods please heed the results.

My apolgies for any problems for admins I just caused but i have reached my boiling point.

[countblah]

This topic will probably be zapped pretty quickly, but for the record, right now it's 100% to 0%.

Pretty telling.

[Venom]

do we get free beer if we click yes? :beer:

[Fallen Templar]

I wanna bet theirs 1 no

[ultradoug]

hey you know what, I expect to see 3 people say this is a bad idea.

1: jason.
2: jcb guy.
3: bannister.

of those I will only respect bannister. Pretty much he wants to fight for the underdog, like me, but man. I've tryed it all and I've never asked for anyone to be asked to leave. Now, this is no way bashing jason, in fact, if anyone does bash him, then they are wrong. This is simpley a go or stay. Yes or no. No need to get dirty or call names.
personaly, I'd like to see him change his ways and perhaps see that his behavor is anti-socal and reform. Given that chance, who knows. But, then again I did try myself to help somewhat and got no where fast.
However, it does worry me that it had to come to a community driven effort like this.

[toddrew]

Loathe to post on this topic (and maybe all record of this will vanish 'fore morn' anywho), but unless he's done something beyond being his normal self (or who he consistently choses to be on these boards ;) ), I see no call for banning.

Though refusal to use the quote feature can wear on one :)

And UD, what's with the jcb dis (or am I missing out on an insiders special) :?:

[CornPuff]

I agree with UD.

I didn't vote, as Im sorta against the poll.

I remember when Jason was a smart kid with contrarian views. Its a different Jason these days. He hijacks every thread he posts on and won't let things die. I wish he could just cool his jets.

If I was a mod, and I'm not, I'd give him a week of time out. He's done no one terrible thing, but it seems he tries to aggravate every situation he's in. Not the most shining example of a team player.

I still respect his knowledge of the game and passion for it. Its obvious he knows his stuff, even if he does have a different viewpoint. I just wish he could communicate it a bit better

[Nwojedi]

it's easy to get him to let things die. Just prove him wrong and he won't post in the thread again. I for one, have a high tolerance for pretty much anything, so Jason doesn't really bother me. Now if he sat in front of me in the Titty bar, wearing a big azz hat. I might have to throw down some fistycuffs.

[django]

what did this guy do where is the link? is that teh guy calling himself moses or something?

[Venom]

what did this guy do where is the link? is that teh guy calling himself moses or something?

LOL!!! are you serious, someones going around calling himself moses?

[ultradoug]

http://www.heroscapers.com/community/showthread.php?t=1989&start=0

he got a user tital, that he called signature (?!) posted this topic in heroscape news. (?!) and of course, it was moved. Then I ranted him a new rant of epic doom upon his head. Winner. Me.

Rember guys, your in offtopic. nothing is safe.
Not as long as I'm around!
Besides, in the long run, communitys have never really had a say to as who stays and goes its ultamently up to the sight admin. And although we have like, what 10 of them (!?) the main one to deside the outcome would be truth.

so. I'll just say this.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

[django]

jason ,jesus, MLK i dont get the connection there?is his last name christ? but then how does MLK fit in?

[ultradoug]

all those people were martered for causing trouble.
however, jason does not shine as an example of a community leader as those people did.
I also find it personly offencive that a Holy name be made into some sort of joke, regardless if the person (jason) was clueless on the joke, and in fact thought it was (Heroscape) news. The page policy is that there is no religon debate, thus no flame wars will ensure, posting anything religon realted should be on a form of that nature. Thus saying any name that is or could be consedered Holy by someone is agenst that policy. I REALLY hope the addmin responcible, (funrun) will take off that tital, as only people that have done something good, funny, helpfull (Etc) to the community should get a tital, its also not in the spirit of not bashing members, again agenst the sight policy.

[django]

OH! yeah thats wrong. hell they should call him little hitler,osama,Kim Jong.im not comparing them to Jesus or MLK but if its for being a trouble maker then it should be for the worst not that its any better.

[ultradoug]

no, again, that would be bashing a member. Even if that person is not well liked, that no reasion to bash them.
Again, to prevent nastyness. I dont expect this post to last. I hope it will be locked, not blown up as some good points are covered.
But, meh.

[jdtenor]

Finaly a tread. I love :rofl: voted yes, but people are starting to feel sorry for him 55% yes 44% no. Come on vote with your 1st instict.

[Venom]

its 50-50 right now.

[Grungebob]

Locking this one down. You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. Jason has done nothing more than be a constant annoyance. He is on thin ice as it is so leave it rest. It is noted that a few of you feel strongly enough to start a poll, but this is in poor taste and will not be tolerated.